Table 2 The actual and estimated FP's and FN's for the simulated data in the Results section. Often FP is quite well estimated, while the estimate FN^ seems to have a bias, but nevertheless captures the changes that takes place.
normal | ||||
| Â | Â | significance level | ||
p 0 | parameter | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.1 |
0.95 | FP | 213 | 492 | 970 |
| Â |
| 192 | 480 | 960 |
| Â | FN | 291 | 216 | 161 |
| Â |
| 205 | 139 | 86 |
0.9 | FP | 173 | 447 | 920 |
| Â |
| 182 | 455 | 910 |
| Â | FN | 611 | 442 | 334 |
| Â |
| 552 | 382 | 256 |
lognormal | ||||
0.95 | FP | 191 | 492 | 940 |
| Â |
| 192 | 480 | 960 |
| Â | FN | 253 | 181 | 133 |
| Â |
| 267 | 183 | 139 |
0.9 | FP | 144 | 415 | 834 |
| Â |
| 182 | 457 | 914 |
| Â | FN | 529 | 366 | 256 |
| Â |
| 456 | 296 | 224 |
