Table 4 Performance comparison of the different clustering methods on the real-world dataset
Tool | Identity (%) | AMI (%) | FMI (%) | ACC (%) | HOMO (%) | COMP (%) | Time (min:sec) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MeShClust | 80.0 | 0.20 | 30.37 | 15.93 | 0.32 | 19.02 | 0:51.35 |
CD-HIT | 80.0 | 77.86 | 71.68 | 64.68 | 96.31 | 65.57 | 0:02.36 |
UCLUST | 80.0 | 56.86 | 35.70 | 20.96 | 99.96 | 41.24 | 0:02.2 |
MeShClust | 85.0 | 4.63 | 29.53 | 17.13 | 3.14 | 25.76 | 1:31.95 |
CD-HIT | 85.0 | 70.21 | 56.74 | 50.29 | 99.77 | 54.71 | 0:03.14 |
UCLUST | 85.0 | 50.08 | 27.07 | 16.35 | 99.97 | 36.12 | 0:01.73 |
MeShClust | 90.0 | 27.06 | 23.52 | 23.02 | 24.44 | 34.50 | 3:02.26 |
CD-HIT | 90.0 | 56.88 | 34.81 | 27.64 | 99.96 | 41.60 | 0:07.89 |
UCLUST | 90.0 | 40.92 | 18.21 | 12.35 | 99.98 | 30.93 | 0:02.79 |
MeShClust | 95.0 | 26.54 | 21.75 | 18.98 | 29.42 | 30.36 | 7:31.98 |
CD-HIT | 95.0 | 39.71 | 18.30 | 13.56 | 99.98 | 30.72 | 0:21.57 |
UCLUST | 95.0 | 31.10 | 13.39 | 9.63 | 99.99 | 27.32 | 0:04.32 |
HycDemux | —- | 90.60 | 91.55 | 88.19 | 99.47 | 83.22 | 0:13.45 |