Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of pathogenicity and LOF of reclassified variants

From: Revisiting the morbid genome of Mendelian disorders

HGMD

Reclassification criteria

Total reclassified

Pathogenicity prediction

(SIFT, PolyPhen, MutationTaster, metaSVM, CADD)

LOF

(stop-gain, frameshift, splicing)

Criteria1: > = 0.05

(Additional file 1: Table S1)

255

9, 24, 16, 5, 77

13, 7, 15 (13.3%)

Criteria 2: > = 0.05 in SGP (and < 0.05 in PublicDB)

(Additional file 3: Table S3)

16

5, 3, 8, 5, 12

2, 0, 1 (18%)

Criteria 3: > = 0.01 in SGP (at least 1 hom)

(Additional file 5: Table S5)

607

97, 127, 149, 66, 288

34, 0, 16 (8.2%)

Criteria 4: <0.01, hom in SGP, no association with disease

(Additional file 7: Table S7)

215

58, 84, 105, 60, 141

7, 0, 5 (5.5%)

 

Total = 1093

  

ClinVar

Reclassification criteria

Total reclassified

Pathogenicity prediction

(SIFT, PolyPhen, MutationTaster, metaSVM, CADD)

LOF

(stop-gain, frameshift, splicing)

Criteria1 > = 0.05

(Additional file 2: Table S2)

334

23, 35, 11, 9, 65

2, 1, 6 (2.7%)

Criteria 2: > = 0.05 in SGP (and < 0.05 in PublicDB)

(Additional file 4: Table S4)

10

1, 2, 4, 1, 6

0, 0, 1 (10%)

Criteria 3: > = 0.01 in SGP (at least 1 hom)

(Additional file 6: Table S6)

484

69, 86, 70, 41, 165

3, 0, 5 (1.65%)

Criteria 4: <0.01, hom in SGP, no association with disease

(Additional file 8: Table S8)

70

17, 25, 27, 21, 41

1, 0, 0 (1.4%)

 

Total = 898

  
  1. For each set of reclassified variants, a summary of the pathogenicity as predicted by different software tools including, SIFT, Polyphen2, MutationTaster, MetaSVM, and CADD is given. Also a summary of LOF variants, including those with stop-gain, frameshifts, and splicing, is also given