Co-survival of the fittest few: mosaic amplification of receptor tyrosine kinases in glioblastoma
© BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 9 January 2012
Accepted: 25 January 2012
Published: 30 January 2012
Mosaic amplification of receptor tyrosine kinases in glioblastoma suggests that tumor cells with different progression driver mutations may coevolve rather than compete during clonal evolution.
KeywordsClonal evolution tumor heterogeneity glioblastoma mosaic amplification receptor tyrosine kinases progression driver mutations
Mosaic amplification of receptor tyrosine kinases in glioblastoma
Amplification of RTK genes, including those encoding the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR2), the platelet-derived growth factor receptor A (PDGFRA), and the oncogenes KIT and MET, drives the tumorigenesis of GBM through the activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Usually, only one RTK shows high-level amplification in a given GBM sample. By analyzing The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project copy number data, Snuderl et al.  found, unexpectedly, that 6.3% (13 out of 206) of the GBM cases showed simultaneous amplification of multiple RTKs. The authors were able to confirm the coamplification of MET and PDGFRA within the same tumor cells from a single original TCGA case by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Snuderl et al.  further studied their own GBM cohort using FISH to detect gene amplification and immunofluorescent staining to detect increased protein production. They found that 4.5% (16 out of 350) of GBMs have more than one amplified RTK. A genome-wide copy number assessment, by array comparative genomic hybridization, showed that the amplicons were local, excluding the probability of coamplification due to unusually high chromosomal instability. Unlike the single TCGA case, these multiple RTK amplifications were present in intermingled subpopulations of tumor cells that are all mitotically active.
Nonlinear coevolution of tumor subclones
Snuderl et al.  found that in all cases with observed coamplifications of RTKs, the CDKN2A and TP53 genotypes were concordant in each of the subpopulations, suggesting that these subpopulations share the same precursor and can be considered subclones within each tumor. Not surprisingly, the ratios of subclones with different amplified RTKs varied broadly among tumor samples. A particularly intriguing finding is the spatial distribution of the mosaic subclones within a complete GBM brain autopsy. Although the EGFR- and PDGFRA-amplified subclones are present at a 60:40 ratio in the main tumor mass, the portion infiltrating other tissues contained exclusively EGFR-amplified cells. The uneven distribution suggests that each population may occupy a distinct niche within the tumor microenvironment (Figure 1). Furthermore, the coexistence of two subpopulations with different RTK amplifications could mean a similar level of fitness for each of the subclones. It is even possible that these subclones may cooperate to achieve higher fitness than each of the subclones alone. This scenario is very different from a linear clonal evolution model in which subclones from the primary clone compete for dominance and further mutations in the dominant subclone initiate another round of selection. The hypothesized cooperation among the subclones warrants the survival of the fittest few. In fact, cooperation among different subpopulations of tumor cells is not unprecedented. In GBM tumors with both amplified wild-type EGFR (wtEGFR) and an activated form of this RTK (ΔEGFR), the former is typically expressed at far greater abundance. Inda et al.  showed that cells with ΔEGFR secrete interleukin-6 and/or leukemia inhibitory factor, both of which activate the wtEGFR in neighboring cells through the receptor gp130, enhancing the rate of tumor growth. Thus, cooperation of tumor subclones can be achieved by paracrine signaling and can actively maintain tumor heterogeneity. Although other tumor types may conceivably have similar paracrine signaling among tumor subclones, direct evidence is still lacking. The scarcity of fibroblasts in GBMs may be a selection force for subclones that can provide mitogenic signals and other forms of support for tumor growth that are delivered by the stroma in other tumors.
Multiplicity of drivers and therapeutic implications
By using a clever combination of genomic data, FISH, immunofluorescent staining and other approaches, Snuderl et al.  have revealed the mosaic amplification of multiple RTKs in GBMs and delineated clonal evolution within these tumors in molecular and spatial detail. Clonal evolution is generally thought to be driven by the driver mutations that provide a selective growth advantage. Observations made in this study  highlight the division of driver mutations into early (initiating) drivers and late (progression) drivers. The tumor-initiating driver, apparently the loss of CDKN2A in the GBMs investigated in this study, is expected to be present in all tumor cells. The late (or progression) drivers, such as EGFR, PDGFRA and MET in this study, can be heterogeneous within a single tumor.
The authors  also identified a case of salivary duct carcinoma with amplification of ERBB2 and PDGFRA in separate subclones, suggesting that the mosaic amplification of multiple RTKs is not limited to GBMs. The coamplification of multiple RTKs in GBMs and other tumors may demand treatments targeting multiple RTKs. However, if subclones with amplification of different RTKs depend on each other for survival and growth, hitting one partner may be sufficient to disrupt tumor growth. A better understanding of the complex relationships among tumor subclones with amplifications of different RTKs and other key genetic alterations would guide the selection of the weakest link to target, thus achieving the maximal therapeutic benefits with the fewest side effects.
The authors are supported by grants from the NIH (R01DK081592, R01DK087960, U01HG005209, U54HG003079, and R01HG005690). We thank Timothy J Ley for constructive comments on the manuscript.
- Ding L, Ellis MJ, Li S, Larson DE, Chen K, Wallis JW, Harris CC, McLellan MD, Fulton RS, Fulton LL, Abbott RM, Hoog J, Dooling DJ, Koboldt DC, Schmidt H, Kalicki J, Zhang Q, Chen L, Lin L, Wendl MC, McMichael JF, Magrini VJ, Cook L, McGrath SD, Vickery TL, Appelbaum E, Deschryver K, Davies S, Guintoli T, Lin L, et al: Genome remodelling in a basal-like breast cancer metastasis and xenograft. Nature. 2010, 464: 999-1005. 10.1038/nature08989.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ding L, Ley TJ, Larson DE, Miller CA, Koboldt DC, Welch JS, Ritchey JK, Young MA, Lamprecht T, McLellan MD, McMichael JF, Wallis JW, Lu C, Shen D, Harris CC, Dooling DJ, Fulton RS, Fulton LL, Chen K, Schmidt H, Kalicki-Veizer J, Magrini VJ, Cook L, McGrath SD, Vickery TL, Wendl MC, Heath S, Watson MA, Link DC, Tomasson MH, et al: Clonal evolution in relapsed acute myeloid leukemia revealed by whole-genome sequencing. Nature. 2012, 481: 506-510. 10.1038/nature10738. doi:10.1038/nature10738PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jones S, Chen WD, Parmigiani G, Diehl F, Beerenwinkel N, Antal T, Traulsen A, Nowak MA, Siegel C, Velculescu VE, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Willis J, Markowitz SD: Comparative lesion sequencing provides insights into tumor evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008, 105: 4283-4288. 10.1073/pnas.0712345105.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Campbell PJ, Pleasance ED, Stephens PJ, Dicks E, Rance R, Goodhead I, Follows GA, Green AR, Futreal PA, Stratton MR: Subclonal phylogenetic structures in cancer revealed by ultra-deep sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008, 105: 13081-13086. 10.1073/pnas.0801523105.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Notta F, Mullighan CG, Wang JC, Poeppl A, Doulatov S, Phillips LA, Ma J, Minden MD, Downing JR, Dick JE: Evolution of human BCR-ABL1 lymphoblastic leukaemia-initiating cells. Nature. 2011, 469: 362-367. 10.1038/nature09733.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Anderson K, Lutz C, van Delft FW, Bateman CM, Guo Y, Colman SM, Kempski H, Moorman AV, Titley I, Swansbury J, Kearney L, Enver T, Greaves M: Genetic variegation of clonal architecture and propagating cells in leukaemia. Nature. 2011, 469: 356-361. 10.1038/nature09650.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yachida S, Jones S, Bozic I, Antal T, Leary R, Fu B, Kamiyama M, Hruban RH, Eshleman JR, Nowak MA, Velculescu VE, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA: Distant metastasis occurs late during the genetic evolution of pancreatic cancer. Nature. 2010, 467: 1114-1117. 10.1038/nature09515.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Navin N, Kendall J, Troge J, Andrews P, Rodgers L, McIndoo J, Cook K, Stepansky A, Levy D, Esposito D, Muthuswamy L, Krasnitz A, McCombie WR, Hicks J, Wigler M: Tumour evolution inferred by single-cell sequencing. Nature. 2011, 472: 90-94. 10.1038/nature09807.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Snuderl M, Fazlollahi L, Le LP, Nitta M, Zhelyazkova BH, Davidson CJ, Akhavanfard S, Cahill DP, Aldape KD, Betensky RA, Louis DN, Iafrate AJ: Mosaic amplification of multiple receptor tyrosine kinase genes in glioblastoma. Cancer Cell. 2011, 20: 810-817. 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.11.005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Inda MM, Bonavia R, Mukasa A, Narita Y, Sah DW, Vandenberg S, Brennan C, Johns TG, Bachoo R, Hadwiger P, Tan P, Depinho RA, Cavenee W, Furnari F: Tumor heterogeneity is an active process maintained by a mutant EGFR-induced cytokine circuit in glioblastoma. Genes Dev. 2010, 24: 1731-1745. 10.1101/gad.1890510.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar