Sex lethal and upstream ORFs: a bait-and-trap system for ribosomes
© BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Published: 25 July 2011
An upstream ORF cooperates with Sex lethal to inhibit msl-2 translation during Drosophila sex determination, a biological principle with potentially broad application in gene regulation.
Upstream open reading frames (uORFs) in mRNAs are short sequences in the 5' untranslated region (UTR) characterized by a start codon, a short open reading frame (ORF) and a stop codon, all upstream of the major start codon that initiates translation of the principal gene product. (The term UTR is actually a misnomer, precisely because of the existence of uORFs, and is more accurately referred to as transcript leader region .) A ribosome encountering a uORF has several options, including scanning through the uORF until the major ORF is encountered, translating the uORF and then reinitiating translation of the major ORF, or translating the uORF and then stalling. The latter case can lead to decreased translation of the major ORF, or possibly shortened mRNA half-life by nonsense-mediated decay . Thus, uORFs present diverse opportunities for regulation of gene expression. The likely importance of uORFs is suggested by their presence in about half of all annotated transcripts in both humans and mice . Analysis of a group of uORF-containing mRNAs showed that uORFs reduce protein expression by 30 to 80%. uORF-altering mutations have been predicted or confirmed in more than a dozen human-disease-associated genes . The molecular mechanisms underlying the effect of uORFs on translation are not well understood. There is overwhelming evidence for the importance of mRNA secondary structure in uORF-mediated regulation of translation [3, 4]; however, a role for specific 5' UTR-binding proteins is less certain. In an elegant report in Cell, Matthias Hentze and colleagues  elucidate a uORF-dependent mechanism by which the Drosophila mRNA-binding protein Sex lethal (Sxl) inhibits translation of its target transcript, male-specific lethal (msl)-2.
Sex determination by dual interaction of Sxl with msl-2mRNA
The role of a uORF in inhibition of msl-2translation by Sxl
Taking advantage of a cell-free translation system derived from Drosophila embryos, the recent publication from the Hentze laboratory  reveals that a uORF synergizes with Sxl to inhibit msl-2 mRNA translation. They show that msl-2 mRNA contains three uORFs upstream of the Sxl binding site, but only the 3'-most of the uORFs is essential for Sxl-directed translational control. Mutation analysis of the uORF and its immediate surroundings indicated that recognition of the uAUG upstream initiation site by scanning ribosomes is essential for control; however, regulation is independent of the coding sequence of the uORF and of its elongation and termination. As expected, both Sxl and the poly(U) binding site in the 5' UTR are also essential for uORF-mediated translational control. Interestingly, the critical sequence elements are well-conserved in a dozen Drosophilid species, notably the upstream optimal context, the presence of precisely one codon between the uAUG and UGA, and a downstream poly(U) stretch separated from the uORF by a spacer of variable sequence and length. The role of the proximal pair of uORFs in the context of translational regulation by Sxl was clearly ruled out by deletion analysis , but it is interesting to speculate on alternative regulatory functions, and on whether these sequences are also conserved in other Drosophilid species.
Exploring the molecular mechanism underlying the cooperative inhibition of msl-2 translation by Sxl and the uORF, the authors  found that Sxl binding to the 5' UTR has a two-fold action: it promotes PIC recognition of the uAUG and then freezes or slows its scanning action (Figure 1). Both activities inhibit translation of the downstream major coding sequence. Thus, Sxl acts as a bait to attract the ribosome to the uAUG initiation codon within the uORF, as well as a trap to prevent it from escaping. To investi-gate the specificity of the RNA-binding protein, the authors  replaced Sxl and its binding site with a distinct RNA-binding protein, polypyrimidine tract-binding protein (PTB), and its cognate poly(CU) binding site. Indeed, PTB strongly repressed reporter mRNA translation, but in a uORF-independent way, suggesting that inhibition by the uORF-Sxl couple is not by a simple steric arrest mechanism. Insertion of the essential elements of the msl-2 5' UTR into the human β-globin 5' UTR allowed Sxl-mediated translational suppression, clearly demonstrating the heterologous nature of the elements. However, the degree of inhibition was less than that of the comparable msl-2 reporter , suggesting fine-tuning by cis features (for example, the upstream msl-2 uORFs), and potentially trans-acting factors, that have not yet been identified.
uORF-mediated regulation of translation by Sxl might be widespread
Bioinformatic analysis showed that about half of the 20,000 annotated 5' UTR sequences in the Drosophila melanogaster transcriptome contain one or more uAUGs . The investigators report the presence of 268 Drosophila mRNAs with elements paralleling those in msl-2: a uAUG appropriately spaced before a poly(U) stretch. The uORFs of 6 of 12 candidate transcripts examined mediated Sxl-dependent suppression of translation, suggesting a rather promiscuous control mechanism. Intriguingly, ribosomal protein RPS14a is a verified target, a finding reminiscent of the 5' UTR-mediated regulation common to metazoan mRNAs encoding ribosomal proteins. However, an analysis of gene ontology is not provided, and there is no information about the possible coherence of the post-transcriptional regulon specified by the uORF-Sxl couple, or on co-regulation of other transcripts involved in sex determination or development .
Perspectives and unanswered questions
Like most important discoveries, the investigation by Hentze and colleagues  raises at least as many interesting questions as it answers. The experiments delineate a narrow temporal and spatial window of operation of Sxl after recognition of the translation initiation codon by the PIC but before elongation. The authors speculate that Sxl might influence the conversion of the PIC from the scanning-competent open conformation to the scanning-arrested closed conformation that is competent for joining of the 60S subunit . However, the precise peri-initiation step inhibited by Sxl has not yet been identified, nor has subunit joining to form a translation-competent ribosome been determined in the context of the isolated 5' UTR. Likewise, the specific communication between Sxl and the uORF-bound translation machinery remains unknown. Yeast two-hybrid experiments revealed specific interaction of Sxl with eIF3h and eIF3i PIC subunits, but the authors  were unable to obtain evidence for a role of these interactions in stalling or locking the PIC on the uORF. Possibly, the inhibitory activity of Sxl requires co-repressors to facilitate the interaction with PIC components, as is the case of the 3' UTR where UNR bridges Sxl and poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) to prevent PIC recruitment to the initiation factor complex (Figure 1). It is unlikely that UNR acts as a 5' co-repressor because it would be expected to bind PABP and prevent PIC recruitment (see below). To investigate the possible role of other factors, it will be informative to determine whether recombinant Sxl represses translation of a reporter mRNA containing the msl-2 5' UTR in rabbit reticulocyte or wheat germ lysates in which Drosophila-specific cofactors are likely to be absent.
Previous studies showed that Sxl binding to a poly(U) element in the msl-2 3' UTR blocks initiation by preventing PIC recruitment to the transcript. The authors  suggest the dual inhibitory mechanisms might act as a fail-safe system to ensure appropriate msl-2 repression and dosage compensation . To minimize confounding by the 3' UTR-driven mechanism, the authors here  have investigated the msl-2 5' UTR in isolation. Thus, the relative importance of the two mechanisms remains unclear. If the proximal 5'-driven mechanism is highly efficient, then the failure of PIC recruitment would alleviate the necessity for the 3'-driven mechanism. Possibly, both mechanisms are highly efficient, as would be required to silence gene expression completely. An advantage of most translational control mechanisms is their reversibility. However, in this case reversible binding of Sxl to msl-2 UTRs could be detrimental to the organism and leads one to ask why this mode of regulation was selected for this critical developmental process instead of an irreversible, transcription-driven mechanism.
The finding that Sxl co-regulates other Drosophila transcripts in a uORF-dependent manner  clearly indicates the global importance of the mechanism, most likely extending beyond sex determination. Importantly, these results introduce the possibility that distinct uORFs cooperate with 5' UTR elements that bind non-Sxl mRNA-binding proteins to regulate translation of other post-transcriptional regulons, and not just in Drosophila, but also in other organisms, including mammals. Finally, these results expand an emerging paradigm in which binary (and possibly ternary) regulatory modules, consisting of nearby mRNA elements and their RNA-binding proteins, behave in a combinatorial, context-specific way to regulate translation and gene expression .
- Morris DR, Geballe AP: Upstream open reading frames as regulators of mRNA translation. Mol Cell Biol. 2000, 20: 8635-8642. 10.1128/MCB.20.23.8635-8642.2000.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Calvo SE, Pagliarini DJ, Mootha VK: Upstream open reading frames cause widespread reduction of protein expression and are polymorphic among humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009, 106: 7507-7512. 10.1073/pnas.0810916106.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hinnebusch AG: Translational regulation of GCN4 and the general amino acid control of yeast. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2005, 59: 407-450. 10.1146/annurev.micro.59.031805.133833.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yaman I, Fernandez J, Liu H, Caprara M, Komar AA, Koromilas AE, Zhou L, Snider MD, Scheuner D, Kaufman RJ, Hatzoglou M: The zipper model of translational control: a small upstream ORF is the switch that controls structural remodeling of an mRNA leader. Cell. 2003, 113: 519-531. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00345-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Medenbach J, Seiler M, Hentze MW: Translational control via protein-regulated upstream open reading frames. Cell. 2011, 145: 902-913. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.05.005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kelley RL, Solovyeva I, Lyman LM, Richman R, Solovyev V, Kuroda MI: Expression of msl-2 causes assembly of dosage compensation regulators on the X chromosomes and female lethality in Drosophila. Cell. 1995, 81: 867-877. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90007-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Beckmann K, Grskovic M, Gebauer F, Hentze MW: A dual inhibitory mechanism restricts msl-2 mRNA translation for dosage compensation in Drosophila. Cell. 2005, 122: 529-540. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.06.011.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Duncan KE, Strein C, Hentze MW: The SXL-UNR corepressor complex uses a PABP-mediated mechanism to inhibit ribosome recruitment to msl-2 mRNA. Mol Cell. 2009, 36: 571-582. 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.042.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Passmore LA, Schmeing TM, Maag D, Applefield DJ, Acker MG, Algire MA, Lorsch JR, Ramakrishnan V: The eukaryotic translation initiation factors eIF1 and eIF1A induce an open conformation of the 40S ribosome. Mol Cell. 2007, 26: 41-50. 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.03.018.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ray PS, Jia J, Yao P, Majumder M, Hatzoglou M, Fox PL: A stress-responsive RNA switch regulates VEGFA expression. Nature. 2009, 457: 915-919. 10.1038/nature07598.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar