We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly. Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact us so we can address the problem.

The cullin protein family

Genome Biology201112:220

DOI: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-4-220

Published: 28 April 2011

Summary

Cullin proteins are molecular scaffolds that have crucial roles in the post-translational modification of cellular proteins involving ubiquitin. The mammalian cullin protein family comprises eight members (CUL1 to CUL7 and PARC), which are characterized by a cullin homology domain. CUL1 to CUL7 assemble multi-subunit Cullin-RING E3 ubiquitin ligase (CRL) complexes, the largest family of E3 ligases with more than 200 members. Although CUL7 and PARC are present only in chordates, other members of the cullin protein family are found in Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans, Arabidopsis thaliana and yeast. A cullin protein tethers both a substrate-targeting unit, often through an adaptor protein, and the RING finger component in a CRL. The cullin-organized CRL thus positions a substrate close to the RING-bound E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, which catalyzes the transfer of ubiquitin to the substrate. In addition, conjugation of cullins with the ubiquitin-like molecule Nedd8 modulates activation of the corresponding CRL complex, probably through conformational regulation of the interactions between cullin's carboxy-terminal tail and CRL's RING subunit. Genetic studies in several model organisms have helped to unravel a multitude of physiological functions associated with cullin proteins and their respective CRLs. CRLs target numerous substrates and thus have an impact on a range of biological processes, including cell growth, development, signal transduction, transcriptional control, genomic integrity and tumor suppression. Moreover, mutations in CUL7 and CUL4B genes have been linked to hereditary human diseases.

Gene organization and evolutionary history

Cullins, containing an evolutionarily conserved cullin homology domain, are a family of structurally related proteins required for ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation (Box 1). Two groups have made important contributions to the discovery of this protein family. Kipreos et al. [1] identified cullins as a novel gene family involved in cell cycle regulation in nematodes. Independently, Mathias et al. [2] isolated Cdc53 (cell division control protein 53), a cullin homolog in budding yeast, and elucidated its role in ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis of cell-cycle regulators. Thus, cullins are named after their role in 'culling', sorting or 'selecting' cellular proteins for ubiquitin-mediated proteasomal degradation (E Kipreos, personal communication).

The cullin gene family is evolutionarily conserved. Table 1 presents a list of the cullin family genes from a range of representative species with respect to their gene organization and expression. There are seven cullins in mammals (CUL1 to CUL3, CUL4a, CUL4b, CUL5, CUL7 and the closely related p53-associated parkin-like cytoplasmic protein (Parc) in Homo sapiens, Mus musculus and Rattus norvegicus), six in C. elegans (cul-1 to cul-6) and five in Drosophila (CUL1 to CUL5). Arabidopsis has five cullins (CUL1, CUL2, CUL3A, CUL4 and CUL5), and yeast genomes encode three cullin proteins (cul1, cul3, cul8 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae; cul1, cul3 and cul4 in Schizosaccharomyces pombe). In total, 490 cullin domains in 490 proteins are described in the SMART nrdb database [3], which estimates 60% conservation in the cullin homology domains.
Table 1

Chromosomal localization of the cullin genes from several representative species

 

Gene

 

Cul1

Cul2

Cul3

Cul3a

Cul3b

Cul4

Cul4a

Cul4b

Cul5

Cul6

Cul7

Cul8

Parc

Human

             

   Gene ID

8454

8453

8452

NP

NP

NP

8451

8450

8065

NP

9820

NP

23113

   Chromosomal localization

7q36.1

10p11.21

2q36.2

NP

NP

NP

13q34

Xq23

11q22-q23

NP

6p21.1

NP

6p21.1

   Introns

21

20

15

NP

NP

NP

19

19/21

18

NP

25

NP

40

   Isoforms

1

1

1

NP

NP

NP

2

2

1

NP

2

NP

1

Mouse

             

   Gene ID

26965

71745

26554

NP

NP

NP

99375

72584

75717

NP

66515

NP

78309

   Chromosomal localization

6; B3

18; A1

1; C4

NP

NP

NP

8; A1.1

X; A2

9; C

NP

17; C

NP

17; C

   Introns

21

20

15

NP

NP

NP

19

22

18/19

NP

25

NP

41

   Isoforms

1

1

1

NP

NP

NP

1

1

2

NP

1

NP

1

Rat

             

   Gene ID

362356

361258

301555

NP

NP

NP

361181

302502

64624

NP

363191

NP

316228

   Chromosomal localization

4q24

17q12.1

9q34

NP

NP

NP

16q12.5

Xq11

8q24

NP

9q12

NP

9q12

C. elegans

             

   Gene ID

176466

176806

178547

NP

NP

174198

NP

NP

179413

178214

NP

NP

NP

   Chromosomal localization

III

III

V

NP

NP

II

NP

NP

V

IV

NP

NP

NP

Drosophila

             

   Gene ID

(lin19) 35742

35420

34896

NP

NP

35780

NP

NP

43434

NP

NP

NP

NP

   Chromosomal localization

2R; 43F1-43F2

2L; 39E3-39E6

2L; 35C5-35C5

NP

NP

2R; 44A4-44A4

NP

NP

3R; 98F6-98F6

NP

NP

NP

NP

A. thaliana

             

   Gene ID

(ATCUL1) 825648

839415

NP

(ATCUL3) 839226

843303

834663

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

   Chromosomal localization

4

1

NP

1

1

5

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

S. cerevisiae

             

   Gene ID

(Cdc53) 851424

NP

852886

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

(RTT101) 853400

NP

   Chromosomal localization

V

NP

VII

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

X

NP

S. pombe

             

   Gene ID

2542393

NP

2542637

NP

NP

(pcu4) 2543116

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

   Chromosomal localization

I

NP

I

NP

NP

I

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

Gene IDs are as listed in Entrez Gene [59]. The intron number and transcript information are indicated for the cullin genes in human and mouse. Only the variants in Entrez Gene are indicated and other variants may exist. NP, not present.

Figure 1 summarizes the phylogenetic relationships among the cullins based on sequence alignment. The presence of the Cul1 to Cul5 genes in the early-branching metazoans Trichoplax adhaerens and Nematostella vectensis indicates that cullin genes are ancient and originated before the separation of the different animal lineages. An extensive genome-wide analysis of the cullin family has suggested that three ancestral cullin genes, termed 'Culα', 'Culβ' and 'Culγ', appeared in early eukaryotic evolution, from which the cullin genes evolved after the split of the unikonts (which include animals and fungi) and the bikonts (which include plants). In this model, the human CUL1, CUL2, CUL5, CUL7 and PARC genes were derived from one common ancestral gene (Culα), whereas the Cul3 and Cul4a/4b genes evolved from two distinct ancestors, the Culβ and Culγ gene, respectively [4]. Notably, Cul7 and Parc, found only in chordates, are highly similar in sequence and both contain a CPH (conserved in CUL7, PARC and HERC2) domain and a DOC domain (similar to the DOC1 of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome) of unknown functions (Figure 2). In human and mouse, Cul7 and Parc are located on the same chromosome in close proximity (260 kb apart). Based on these findings, Marin et al. [5] suggested that Parc originated from a gene fusion of a duplicate of Cul7 and an ariadne gene, which encodes a putative E3 ubiquitin ligase sharing structural similarity with Parkin. Fungal species contain only three cullin genes: Cdc53, Cul3 and Cul8 (also known as RTT101) in S. cerevisiae and Cul1, Cul3 and Cul4 in S. pombe [4]. However, Cul8/RTT101 in Saccharomycotina differs significantly from the Cul4-like genes of other fungi (such as ascomycetes and basidiomycetes) [4]. It was postulated that Cul8/RTT101 originated from the Cul4 gene that underwent an accelerated evolution, or that Saccharomycotina has lost their Cul4-like gene and the Cul8/RTT101 gene arose in parallel as a result of gene duplication.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fgb-2011-12-4-220/MediaObjects/13059_2011_Article_2514_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree of the cullin gene family. Phylogenetic tree based on the alignment of cullins of Homo sapiens (Hs), Mus musculus (Mm), Rattus norvegicus (Rn), Drosophila melanogaster (Dm) and Caenorhabditis elegans (Ce). Gene IDs are as listed in Table 1. ClustalX was used to align sequences using the standard settings. The tree was drawn using Figtree v1.3.1. The bar indicates the proportion of amino acid sites at which two compared sequences are different. Iso, isoform.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fgb-2011-12-4-220/MediaObjects/13059_2011_Article_2514_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Cullin protein domain organization in humans. Cullin repeat 1 (CR1) anchors the cognate adaptor proteins, and the cullin homology domain (CH) at the carboxyl terminus is critical for binding of the RING-finger protein. The red line indicates the position of the neddylation site. For CUL7 and PARC the neddylation site is based on consensus sequence alignment without experimental verification. Size and location of the individual domains are schematic representations and do not depict the exact proportions. Abbreviations: aa, amino acids; CH, cullin homology domain; CPH, conserved domain in CUL7, PARC and HERC2; CR, cullin repeat; DOC, a domain similar to the DOC1 domain of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome but of unknown function; IBR, in between RING; RING, really interesting new gene.

Characteristic structural features

RING (really interesting new gene)-type E3 ubiquitin ligases orchestrate ubiquitination by simultaneously binding to a protein substrate and anchoring an E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme through the RING domain (for detailed description of the actions of E2 and E3 in ubiquitination, see Boxes 1 and 2 and Figure 3). Cullins are molecular scaffolds that organize the largest class of RING E3 ligases, known as the cullin-RING ligase complexes (CRLs). Below we discuss how cullins use their unique structural properties to assemble their cognate CRLs.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fgb-2011-12-4-220/MediaObjects/13059_2011_Article_2514_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

The ubiquitin-proteasome system. The conserved 76-amino-acid polypeptide ubiquitin (Ub) is activated in an ATP-dependent reaction by an E1 ubiquitin-activating enzyme and transferred to an E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme. An E3 ubiquitin ligase binds both the substrate protein and a ubiquitin-charged E2 enzyme for ubiquitin transfer, resulting in the mono-, multi- (not shown) or polyubiquitination of the substrate. The mode of ubiquitination determines whether the substrate protein is degraded by the 26S proteasome or altered in a non-proteolytic manner. See Boxes 1 and 2 for additional information.

The structural properties of cullins have been revealed in the context of CRLs by high-resolution structural studies and biochemical reconstitution experiments (Table 2). Although all the cullin (and CRL) structures that have been solved so far have been mammalian proteins (Table 2), the interactions between cullins and their CRL components have been analyzed using biochemical assays in systems from yeast to humans, highlighting an extraordinary conservation regarding the scaffolding functions of cullins. Thus, the cullin and CRL structural models discussed in this section are generally applicable to counterparts of all origins.
Table 2

Cullin structures and cullin-RING E3 complex assembly

Protein

E3 components

Structures solved*

Key recognition fold on adaptor

Key determinants on cullin NTD

 

Adaptor

Substrate recognition

RING

   

CUL1

Skp1

F-box protein

ROC1/Rbx1

CUL1-Rbx1-Skp1-F boxSkp2 [6]; Skp1-Skp2 [60]

Skp1/BTB/POZ fold in Skp1 [6]

CUL1 H2 and H5 helices [6]

CUL2

EloC/EloB

VHL

ROC1/Rbx1

No CUL2 structure; VHL-EloC-EloB [60]

Skp1/BTB/POZ fold in EloC [6, 61]

CUL2 H2 and H5 helices [14]

CUL3

BTB (adaptor-targeting)

BTB (adaptor-targeting)

ROC1/Rbx1

SPOP BTB-SBC [13]

BTB [13]; 3-box [13]

CUL3 H2 and H5 helices [62]

CUL4A

DDB1

DCAF

ROC1/Rbx1

DDB1-CUL4A-ROC1 [9]; DDB1-V protein [8]

BPB in DDB1 [9]

CUL4A H2 and H5 helices [9]; CUL4A amino-terminal extension [9]

CUL4B

DDB1

DCAF

ROC1/Rbx1

Not available

BPB in DDB1 (predicted)

CUL4B H2/H5 (predicted)

CUL5

EloC/EloB

SOCS protein

ROC2/Rbx2

CUL5CTD-Rbx1 [37]; SOCS2- EloC-EloB [63]; HIV Vif-EloC-EloB [16]

Skp1/BTB/POZ fold in EloC [6, 61]

CUL5 H2 and H5 helices [64]; CUL5 loop 2 (amino acids 51 to 60) [16]; CUL5 loop 5 (amino acids 118 to 134) [16]

CUL7

Skp1

Fbw8

ROC1/Rbx1

CUL7 CPH-p53 TD [65]

Skp1/BTB/POZ fold in Skp1 (predicted)

Unknown

PARC

Unknown

Unknown

Unknown

Not available

Unknown

Unknown

*Crystal structures of CRL complexes were solved with recombinant human proteins.

CUL1 to CUL5 have a long stalk-like amino-terminal domain (NTD), consisting of three cullin repeats (CR1 to CR3), and a globular carboxy-terminal domain (CTD), which harbors a signature cullin homology domain (CH), a highly conserved stretch of about 200 amino acids (Figure 2).

The cullin CTD binds to its RING partner, Regulator of cullins 1 (ROC1) or ROC2 (also called RING box protein (Rbx)1 and Rbx2, respectively), which recruits the ubiquitin-loaded E2 enzymes for catalysis. The CUL1-ROC1 association is established by multiple interface interactions, primarily involving CUL1's α/β domain and the amino-terminal S1 β-strand of ROC1, which enable the formation of an intermolecular α/β hydrophobic core that essentially renders CUL1-ROC1 physically inseparable [6]. The cullin-RING interaction creates a catalytic core and is the most characteristic structural feature that defines CRLs [7].

On the basis of structural studies of the human S-phase kinase-associated protein 1 (Skp1)-CUL1-F-box (SCF) complex [6] and the CUL4A RING (CRL4A) complex [8, 9], cullins organize CRLs by forming two distinct modules: a substrate-targeting unit, composed of a substrate-recognition protein and an adaptor protein that links the module to the cullin, and the RING component that is active in recruiting an E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (Figure 4). For instance, SCF contains a substrate recognition subunit known as the F-box protein, which is characterized by a 40-amino-acid F-box domain [10]. The Skp1 adaptor protein mediates binding of the F-box protein to the amino terminus of CUL1. In CRL4A, the substrate-targeting unit is composed of damage-specific DNA binding protein 1 (DDB1) as the adaptor protein, and a member of the DDB1 and CUL4 associated factor (DCAF) family that recognizes a substrate. However, CRL3 does not contain a separate adaptor subunit. Instead, it incorporates BTB (Bric-a-brac, Tramtrack, Broad-complex), a dual function molecule capable of binding to CUL3 and targeting a substrate (Figure 4). (SCF, also called CRL1, is historically the prototype of all CRLs and thus the name SCF remains commonly used in the current literature.)
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fgb-2011-12-4-220/MediaObjects/13059_2011_Article_2514_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Modularity of cullin-RING E3 ligases. Cullin proteins are molecular scaffolds that assemble multi-subunit cullin-RING E3 ubiquitin ligase (CRL) complexes. The mammalian cullin protein family comprises eight members (CUL1 to CUL7 and PARC). In CRL, a cullin protein tethers both a substrate-recognition subunit, often through an adaptor protein, and the RING finger component. The cullin-organized CRL thus positions a substrate in close proximity to the RING-bound E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (not shown), which catalyzes the transfer of ubiquitin to the substrate. (a) General CRL composition. (b) Specific composition of the CRLs 1 to 7 and PARC. BTB, Bric-a-brac, Tramtrack, Broad-complex domain; DCAF, DDB1-CUL4 associated factor; DDB1, DNA damage-binding protein 1; Fbw8, F-box and WD repeat domain containing protein 8; PARC, p53-associated parkin-like cytoplasmic protein; SOCS, Suppressors of cytokine signaling; Skp1, S-phase kinase-associated protein 1; VHL-Box, von Hippel-Lindau box.

Accumulating evidence points to a common mechanism by which CUL1 to CUL5 build a substrate-targeting unit. CUL1 to CUL5 use amino-terminal helices H2 and H5 of CR1 to anchor their cognate adaptors. There are two distinct types of recognition fold in the adaptor (Table 2). In the SCF, CRL2, CRL3 and CRL5 E3s, different adaptors (Skp1, Elongin C (EloC) or BTB) share a similar structural motif termed the Skp1/BTB/Pox virus and zinc finger (POZ) fold, which is a primary determinant for affinity interactions with the cullin amino terminus. By contrast, the DDB1 adaptor of CRL4 lacks the Skp1/BTB/POZ fold and instead uses its BPB domain to interact with the CUL4A H2 and H5 helices, as well as the amino-terminal extension [9]. In this regard, it is worth commenting on the enormous structural complexity of DDB1, a 127 kDa protein containing three large propeller folds [8], which potentially enable multiple interactions with cellular proteins. Indeed, DDB1 was found to form a complex with de-etiolated 1 (DET1), DDB1 associated 1 (DDA1) and the E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme UBE2E [11]. Initial efforts to isolate the human CUL4A-containing complexes resulted in very large complexes that contained the constitutive photomorphogenesis 9 (COP9) signalosome [12]. It remains to be determined whether DDB1 enhances the association between CRL4 and COP9. The role of the COP9 signalosome in CRL function is discussed in the next section.

Structural and biochemical analyses have revealed additional protein-protein interactions that contribute to the cullin-mediated CRL assembly. In addition to the Skp1-CUL1 interactions, Skp2's F-box domain also binds to CUL1, thus contributing to the assembly of the SCFSkp2 complex [6]. Although CUL3 mediates interactions to BTB proteins through the Skp1/BTB/POZ fold, it binds to a conserved helical structure carboxy-terminal of the BTB domain, which was named '3-box' for CUL3-interacting box [13] (Table 2). The CUL3-3-box association strengthens the CUL3-BTB protein interactions. Despite sharing the identical adaptor protein Elongin C (EloC), CUL2 and CUL5 direct the assembly of distinct E3 complexes: CRL2 with von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) or related BC box proteins, and CRL5 containing suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS)-box proteins (Figure 4). However, it is unclear whether CUL2 and CUL5 recognize specific determinants within VHL and SOCS-box proteins, respectively [14, 15]. A recent study provided some insight into how CUL5 assembles into a CRL5 complex with the HIV protein Virion infectivity factor (Vif; a SOCS-box protein), thereby yielding an E3 ligase that targets the human antiviral protein APOBEC3G for proteasomal degradation [16]. It seems that loops 2 and 5 of CUL5 are engaged in interactions with Vif's SOCS-box and zinc finger motif (H-(X)5-C-(X)17-18-C-(X)3-5-H), respectively.

In summary, it seems that to assemble CRLs, cullins not only bind to a common recognition fold in the adaptor, such as the Skp1/BTB/POZ motif (Table 2), but also form interface interactions with structural determinants within the substrate-recognition molecules (SRMs) that include F-box, BTB, VHL and SOCS proteins. However, future structural and biochemical studies, using a larger set of substrates, are required to more rigorously define the 'SRM determinants'. To understand the differential ability of CUL2 and CUL5 to assemble CRL2 and CRL5, respectively, it is critical to solve their structures, especially the amino terminus.

There are no structures available that reveal the three-dimensional organization of either CUL7 or PARC. Although CUL7 resembles CUL1 in using the Skp1 adaptor [17], it remains to be determined how CUL7 selects F-box and WD-repeat-domain-containing protein 8 (Fbw8). At present, it is also unclear whether PARC forms a multi-subunit complex.

Localization and function

Cullin family proteins are involved in a diverse array of functions, including cell-cycle control, DNA replication and development. The major physiological functions of the cullin family proteins have been revealed by genetic ablation experiments in a variety of metazoan model organisms, including mouse, C. elegans and Drosophila (Table 3). In Arabidopsis, CRLs regulate hormonal signaling, light responses, circadian rhythms and photomorphogenesis (for a recent review, see [18]). The cullin family proteins seem to be widely expressed and to locate both to the nucleus and cytoplasm, but there are no compelling data suggesting that cullin activity is controlled by subcellular localization or by differential expression in a tissue-specific manner.
Table 3

Major physiological roles of cullins revealed by deletion studies with model organisms

Protein

Mouse

C. elegans

Drosophila

CUL1

Cell cycle and embryogenesis [66, 67], with KO phenotypes, including: embryonic lethality E5.5 to E6.5; accumulation of cyclin E; increased apoptosis in the ectoderm; large trophoblast giant cells in blastocytes

Cell cycle [1]; germline apoptosis [68]; sex determination [69]

Cell cycle [70, 71]; apoptosis [72]; eye development [73]

CUL2

No mouse model

G1-to-S transition [74]; mitosis [74, 75]; germline lineage [76]; meiosis [7779]; polarity [7779]; oogenesis [80]; MPK1 activation [80]; hypoxic response, aging [81, 82]

 

CUL3

Cell cycle and embryogenesis [83], with KO phenotypes including embryonic lethality <E7.5; accumulation of cyclin E; impaired S-phase entry; failure to endocycle in trophoblasts

Meiosis/mitosis transition [84]; mitosis [85]; meiosis [86]

Eye development [72]; sensory organ [87]; neurons [88]; hedgehog signaling [89, 90]; actin cytoskeleton and cell movement [91, 92]

CUL4

Deletion of Cul4a alone yields no major defects in development as mice lacking Cul4a exons 17 to 19 are viable and normal [93], and mice lacking Cul4a exons 4 to 8 are viable, showing mild decrease in mouse embryonic fibroblast proliferation [33]; a role in DNA repair as skin-specific CUL4A KO show increased resistance to UV-induced skin carcinogenesis [93]

DNA replication [22]

Cell cycle [94]; DNA damage response [95]

CUL5

No mouse model

Oogenesis [80]; MPK1 activation [80]

Cell fate specification [96]; synapse formation [96]; oogenesis [97]

CUL7

Embryonic development, as KO showed neonatal death [98]; required for growth in embryo and placenta [98]; formation of vascular structure [98]

  

PARC

Not essential for development, as KO is viable and normal [99]

  

E, embryonic day; KO, knockout.

Cul1 and Cul3 mouse knockout experiments have revealed their indispensable roles in cell cycle progression and early embryogenesis (Table 3). The role of CUL1 in cell cycle control is understood in considerable detail. It was the pioneering work using the budding and fission yeast systems that led to the discovery of cullins and other CRL components and their role in cell cycle control (reviewed in [19]). Work in C. elegans and Drosophila has demonstrated the requirement of CUL1 for cell cycle progression (Table 3). Mechanistically, it is believed that the CUL1-based SCF regulates the mammalian cell cycle, at least in part, by using the Skp2 F-box protein, which directs the ubiquitin-dependent degradation of p27 and p21 (inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases), thereby activating cyclin-dependent kinases [20]. SCF malfunction has been linked to malignancy, as mutations in the Fbw7 F-box protein are frequently found in a variety of human cancers [21].

Studies with Cul4 deletion in C. elegans have established a crucial role for CUL4 in DNA replication (Table 3). It is well accepted that the CRL4 complex with the DCAF protein Cdt2 as substrate-recognition molecule (referred to as CRL4Cdt2) targets the replication initiation factor Cdt1 for degradation, thereby preventing DNA re-replication [22]. In mammals, CUL4A and CUL4B are believed to be functionally redundant, as deletion of Cul4a in mice resulted in viable animals and relatively subtle phenotypes (Table 3). Clearly, complete understanding of the physiological functions of Cul4 in mouse development requires future studies with animals lacking Cul4b and Cul4a/Cul4b.

There have been no mouse models for either Cul2 or Cul5. However, CRL2pVHL has a critical role in control of oxygen homeostasis, acting by targeting the α subunit of hypoxia-inducing transcription factor (HIF) for degradation (reviewed in [23]). Tissue-specific gene targeting of VHL in mice has demonstrated that efficient execution of CRL2pVHL-mediated HIF-1α proteolysis under normal levels of oxygen is fundamentally important for survival, proliferation, differentiation and normal physiology of many cell types (reviewed in [23]). These studies have explained the tumor suppressor function of VHL, whose germline mutations inactivate its ability to form the CRL2 complex or bind to HIF-α, leading to the formation of highly vascularized tumors such as renal clear-cell carcinomas.

Two hereditary human diseases have been linked to genes encoding members of the cullin protein family. Mutations in the CUL7 gene were linked to 3-M syndrome (Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) ID 273750), an autosomal-recessive disorder characterized by pre- and postnatal growth retardation (final height 3 to 4 standard deviations below the mean for the population), facial dysmorphism, large head circumference, normal intelligence, and skeletal anomalies that include long slender tubular bones and tall vertebral bodies [24, 25]. Huber et al. [24, 25] identified CUL7 gene mutations in 52 out of 62 cases (84%), arguing for CUL7 as the major disease gene of 3-M syndrome. The mutations were located throughout the CUL7 gene and most are predicted to cause premature termination of translation. Reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR analysis of patient fibroblast mRNA detected a CUL7-specific transcript, but at reduced levels, arguing that CUL7 mRNA is expressed at least in a subset of 3-M syndrome patients. Approximately 50% of the mutations identified by Huber et al. [24, 25] are located within the cullin homology domain (exons 19 to 24), which is responsible for ROC1 binding. Biochemical characterization of the CUL7 nonsense and missense mutations Arg1445X (where X indicates a stop codon) and His1464Pro, respectively, were shown to render CUL7 deficient in recruiting ROC1. Arg1445X was predicted to yield a truncated CUL7 polypeptide (lacking the 254 carboxy-terminal amino acids), and His1464Pro was predicted to introduce a structural alteration in the cullin homology domain [24].

A study by Maksimova et al. [26] identified 43 patients from 37 Yakut families, a geographically isolated ethnic group in Russia, with a short stature syndrome similar to 3-M syndrome. A common mutation in the CUL7 gene, insertion T at position 4582 in exon 25, was identified that is predicted to cause a frameshift and subsequent premature stop codon at position 1553 (Q1553X).

Given that cyclin D1 [27] and insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1) [28] are potential proteolytic targets of the CUL7 E3 ligase, it is tempting to speculate that either disturbed cyclin D1-dependent mechanisms or dysregulated IRS-1-mediated signaling pathways might contribute to the pathomechanism of 3-M syndrome. Altogether, studies with 3-M and Yakut patients, combined with proliferative defects observed in Cul7 knockout mice (Table 3), have strongly suggested a prominent role for CUL7 in growth regulation (reviewed by [29]).

Several familial mutations in the CUL4B gene were associated with X-linked mental retardation syndrome (XLMR; OMIM 300639) [30]. The authors [30] reported three truncating, two splice-site and three missense variants at conserved amino acids in the CUL4B gene on Xq24 in 8 of 250 families (3%) with XLMR. During adolescence of these patients a syndrome emerged with delayed puberty, hypogonadism, growth retardation, foot abnormalities, relative macrocephaly, central obesity, aggressive outbursts and seizures. The complex phenotype of patients with CUL4B mutations argues for pleiotropic roles of CUL4B that remain to be determined.

The cullin-based CRLs function through their cognate substrate-recognition molecules, such as the F-box, SOCS, BTB and DCAF proteins (Figure 4 and Table 2). The F-box, SOCS, BTB and DCAF protein families each contain a distinct motif that is recognized by an adaptor molecule, which is linked to a cognate cullin (Figure 4). For example, humans contain about 61 F-box proteins, all of which can bind to Skp1 through the F-box domain. Through Skp1, which binds to CUL1 (Table 2), most of the F-box proteins can thus be assembled into the SCF E3 complex (Figure 4). Bioinformatics studies have identified hundreds of human genes that are predicted to encode F-box, SOCS, BTB and DCAF proteins, thereby potentially forming over 200 CRLs (Figure 5). Although the extent of the CRL family requires experimental verification, it is nonetheless reasonable to assume that CRLs target numerous cellular protein substrates and hence have an impact on all biological processes. In addition, studies with F-box proteins, including β-TrCP, Skp2 and Fbw7, demonstrate an ability of one substrate recognition protein to bind multiple substrates, thereby expanding the functional range of CRLs. For recent reviews on the diverse targeting functions of these proteins, see [10, 31] (F-box family), [32] (BTB family) and [33, 34] (DCAF family).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fgb-2011-12-4-220/MediaObjects/13059_2011_Article_2514_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Cullins assemble the largest subfamily of E3 ubiquitin ligases. Pie chart of the numbers of human E3 ubiquitin ligases, estimated from the numerical distribution of genes predicted to encode E3 RING or HECT polypeptides or, in the case of CRLs, the substrate-recognition molecules that include F-box, SOCS, BTB with 3-box and DCAF proteins. Numbers refer to human gene numbers for F-box, SOCS, HECT, U-box and non-CRL RING proteins, derived from Li et al. [53]. The estimation for the human DCAF family is described by Lee and Zhou [34]. Kay Hofmann has kindly provided the tally of human genes encoding BTB and 3-box proteins (personal communication). The Hofmann estimation is based on the structural work from Schulman and colleagues [13], which identified a critical role for the 3-box in the assembly of CRL3 with the SPOP BTB protein. 72 BTB-only (without 3-box) genes have not been counted for the estimation of CRL3s.

Most, if not all, cullins are found covalently conjugated with an ubiquitin-like molecule, Nedd8. This modification, termed neddylation, activates the E3 ligase activity of CRLs by promoting substrate polyubiquitination (reviewed by [35]). Recent studies have suggested conformation-based mechanisms that explain the activating role of neddylation. In vitro mutagenesis experiments have suggested that the interactions between human ROC1 and CUL1's carboxy-terminal tail in the unmodified state render SCF inactive [36]. It was proposed that the conjugation of Nedd8 to the residue K720 of CUL1 induces drastic conformational changes in CUL1 that liberate ROC1, thereby driving SCF into an active state. This hypothesis was supported by recent structural studies by Schulman and colleagues [37] that revealed extensive conformational changes in CUL5 when conjugated with Nedd8. Another activating mechanism, proposed by Schulman and colleagues [37], suggests that the neddylation-mediated conformational changes in cullin enabled the repositioning of the RING-tethered ubiquitin-loaded E2 to a bound substrate for catalysis. In support of this model, in vitro cross-linking experiments have revealed that neddylation brought a SCF substrate into a close proximity to an E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme [38].

Neddylation is reversed by the COP9 signalosome, which enzymatically removes Nedd8 from a cullin molecule [39]. COP9 is an eight-subunit complex that was originally identified as a suppressor of plant photomorphogenesis [40]. It was shown that COP9's Jab1/Csn5 subunit contains a Jab1/MPN domain metalloenzyme (JAMM) motif critical for COP9's Nedd8 isopeptidase activity [39]. It is thus believed that CRL activities are dynamically controlled by cullin neddylation-deneddylation cycles. It was observed that an SCF complex bound to a substrate contained higher levels of neddylated CUL1, suggesting that substrate-E3 interactions may trigger neddylation [41]. The detailed mechanism, however, remains elusive.

CRL is also regulated by Cullin-associated and neddylation-dissociated-1 (CAND1), which inhibits the E3 ligase activity of CRLs by binding to all cullins in their un-neddylated forms [42, 43]. The CUL1-CAND1 interaction is understood at the structural level, as the human CUL1-Rbx1-CAND1 complex showed that CAND1 binds both the CUL1 amino and carboxyl termini [44]. However, a recent study [45] has revealed that only a small fraction of cullin is bound to CAND1 in human cells. Future studies are required to determine the precise role of CAND1 in regulating CRLs.

Frontiers

By organizing CRLs that presumably direct numerous substrates to ubiquitin-dependent degradation, the cullin family proteins build a cellular regulatory network of fundamental importance in controlling protein homeostasis, thereby altering a wide range of biological processes, from cell cycle regulation to signal transduction.

However, there are several areas that need attention. The development of cutting edge technology for the identification of CRL substrates is crucial. Although bioinformatics predicts a large number of CRLs (Figure 5), we still have knowledge on only a handful of substrates. Proteomics-based approaches and newly developed global protein stability profiling technology [46] have proven effective in the identification of novel substrates. However, it remains to be seen whether these methods, coupled with agents that affect cell signaling, could lead to the isolation of substrates, whose turnover rates are dictated by often transient post-translational modifications, such as phosphorylation [10], prolyl hydroxylation [23] and glycosylation [47].

Although the assembly of a majority of CRLs is understood in considerable detail (Table 2 and Figure 4), little is known about the control of the assembly in cells. It has long been suggested that the substrate-CRL interactions dictate the cullin neddylation-deneddylation cycle, which turns on and off the CRL's E3 ubiquitin ligase activity. However, the mechanism by which this is achieved is elusive.

Given the intricate role of cullins and CRLs in a multitude of biological processes, it is likely that cullin dysfunction will emerge as a pathogenetic factor in diseases. Indeed, CUL7 and CUL4B mutations have been identified in human disorders, but further studies are required to determine the underlying pathomechanisms.

Genetic studies in organisms from yeast to mouse have revealed a prominent role for cullins and CRLs in cell-cycle progression (Table 3). Dysfunction of CRL activities has been associated with oncogenic transformation (reviewed by [48]). Thus, targeting CRLs is an emerging frontier in rational drug design. Recent advances have validated efforts in drug-targeting the ubiquitin-proteasome system, with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib now approved for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma or mantle cell lymphoma (reviewed by [49]). A small molecule inhibitor (MLN4924) suppressing the Nedd8 activating pathway is currently in clinical trials, having demonstrated success in tumor suppression in animal model studies [50], and two small molecule inhibitors have been identified recently to inhibit SCF activities by different mechanisms [51, 52].

Box 1. The ubiquitin-proteasome system

The ubiquitin-proteasome system is a selective protein degradation pathway in which a substrate is first tagged with a chain of ubiquitin and the resulting modified protein is then recognized by the 26S proteasome, where proteolysis of the substrate takes place. The process of ubiquitination involves a three-tiered enzymatic cascade. First, the chemically inert ubiquitin molecule is activated in an ATP-dependent reaction by forming a thioester bond between the carboxy-terminal carboxyl group of ubiquitin and the catalytic cysteine of an E1 activating enzyme. Second, in a trans(thio)esterification reaction ubiquitin is transferred to the active site cysteine of an E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme. In the last step, an E3 ubiquitin ligase functions to orchestrate the transfer of ubiquitin to a substrate protein, forming an isopeptide bond between the ubiquitin carboxy-terminal glycine residue and substrate lysine ε-amino group. The action of an E3 typically involves recognition of a specific degradation motif (degron) on the substrate. The human genome encodes two E1 activating enzymes, 37 E2 conjugating enzymes and more than 500 E3 ubiquitin ligases [54]. A substrate protein can be conjugated with just one ubiquitin (monoubiquitination), one ubiquitin molecule at different lysines residues (multiubiquitination) or by a chain of several ubiquitin moieties (polyubiquitination). Ubiquitin contains seven lysine residues (Lys6, Lys11, Lys27, Lys29, Lys33, Lys48 and Lys63) that can act as acceptors and result in entirely different chain conformations. Polyubiquitination has multifaceted outcomes that depend on the respective chain structure [54]. For instance, although Lys48-linked chains are the canonical recognition motif for the proteasome, Lys63-linked chains have important non-degradative roles in cell signaling, DNA-damage response and endocytosis [55]. Monoubiquitination typically has non-proteolytic functions, such as the internalization of cell-surface receptors [56].

Box 2. E3 ubiquitin ligases

E3 ubiquitin ligases are a diverse group of enzymes that recognize both a substrate protein and an E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme. E3 ubiquitin ligases can be subdivided into two major classes [57]: HECT-type and RING-type E3 ligases.

The single-molecule HECT-type E3 ligases are characterized by a Homologous to the E6-AP carboxyl terminus (HECT) domain that forms a thioester intermediate with ubiquitin as a prerequisite for ubiquitin transfer to the substrate protein.

In contrast, RING-type E3 ligases use RING (really interesting new gene)-zinc finger domains to recruit and allosterically activate an ubiquitin-charged E2 enzyme for direct ubiquitin transfer to the substrate. RING finger domains have a characteristic architecture of three β strands, one α-helical domain and two free loops that are arranged by Zn2+ ions. The loops are stabilized by a cluster of cysteine residues and up to two histidines [57]. U-box E3 ligases are a subgroup of the RING-type E3s and contain a structurally modified RING-motif (the U-box) that lacks the ability to chelate Zn2+ ions [58].

Of about 300 RING proteins expressed in human cells, the multi-subunit cullin-RING Ligase (CRL) complexes constitute the major group and are characterized by two signature components: a cullin (CUL) scaffold protein and the RING-finger protein ROC1 or ROC2 (also known as Rbx1/Hrt1 or Rbx2, respectively) [7].

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Ed Kipreos for communicating the history of the cullin discovery. We thank R Deshaies for helping in the preparation of Figure 5 and K Hofmann for sharing his bioinformatics information on estimation of the number of BTB proteins with a 3-box. We thank Maren Hieber, Kathleen Meyer, Wiebke Schulze and Benjamin Wolf for critical reading of the manuscript. AS was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) grant SA 1706/3-1 and the Marie Curie International Reintegration grant 256584. Z-QP was supported by US Public Health Service grants GM61051 and CA095634.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Technische Universität München
(2)
Department of Oncological Sciences, The Mount Sinai School of Medicine

References

  1. Kipreos ET, Lander LE, Wing JP, He WW, Hedgecock EM: cul-1 is required for cell cycle exit in C. elegans and identifies a novel gene family. Cell. 1996, 85: 829-839. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81267-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Mathias N, Johnson SL, Winey M, Adams AE, Goetsch L, Pringle JR, Byers B, Goebl MG: Cdc53p acts in concert with Cdc4p and Cdc34p to control the G1-to-S-phase transition and identifies a conserved family of proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 1996, 16: 6634-6643.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. The SMART's nrdb database. [http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/smart/do_annotation.pl?DOMAIN=CULLIN]
  4. Marin I: Diversification of the cullin family. BMC Evol Biol. 2009, 9: 267-10.1186/1471-2148-9-267.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Marin I, Lucas JI, Gradilla AC, Ferrus A: Parkin and relatives: the RBR family of ubiquitin ligases. Physiol Genomics. 2004, 17: 253-263. 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00226.2003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Zheng N, Schulman BA, Song L, Miller JJ, Jeffrey PD, Wang P, Chu C, Koepp DM, Elledge SJ, Pagano M, Conaway RC, Conaway JW, Harper JW, Pavletich NP: Structure of the Cul1-Rbx1-Skp1-F boxSkp2 SCF ubiquitin ligase complex. Nature. 2002, 416: 703-709. 10.1038/416703a.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Petroski MD, Deshaies RJ: Function and regulation of cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005, 6: 9-20.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Li T, Chen X, Garbutt KC, Zhou P, Zheng N: Structure of DDB1 in complex with a paramyxovirus V protein: viral hijack of a propeller cluster in ubiquitin ligase. Cell. 2006, 124: 105-117. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.10.033.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Angers S, Li T, Yi X, MacCoss MJ, Moon RT, Zheng N: Molecular architecture and assembly of the DDB1-CUL4A ubiquitin ligase machinery. Nature. 2006, 443: 590-593.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Skaar JR, Pagan JK, Pagano M: SnapShot: F box proteins I. Cell. 2009, 137: 1160-1160.e1. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.039.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Pick E, Lau OS, Tsuge T, Menon S, Tong Y, Dohmae N, Plafker SM, Deng XW, Wei N: Mammalian DET1 regulates Cul4A activity and forms stable complexes with E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes. Mol Cell Biol. 2007, 27: 4708-4719. 10.1128/MCB.02432-06.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Groisman R, Polanowska J, Kuraoka I, Sawada J, Saijo M, Drapkin R, Kisselev AF, Tanaka K, Nakatani Y: The ubiquitin ligase activity in the DDB2 and CSA complexes is differentially regulated by the COP9 signalosome in response to DNA damage. Cell. 2003, 113: 357-367. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00316-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhuang M, Calabrese MF, Liu J, Waddell MB, Nourse A, Hammel M, Miller DJ, Walden H, Duda DM, Seyedin SN, Hoggard T, Harper JW, White KP, Schulman BA: Structures of SPOP-substrate complexes: insights into molecular architectures of BTB-Cul3 ubiquitin ligases. Mol Cell. 2009, 36: 39-50. 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.022.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Kamura T, Maenaka K, Kotoshiba S, Matsumoto M, Kohda D, Conaway RC, Conaway JW, Nakayama KI: VHL-box and SOCS-box domains determine binding specificity for Cul2-Rbx1 and Cul5-Rbx2 modules of ubiquitin ligases. Genes Dev. 2004, 18: 3055-3065. 10.1101/gad.1252404.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Mahrour N, Redwine WB, Florens L, Swanson SK, Martin-Brown S, Bradford WD, Staehling-Hampton K, Washburn MP, Conaway RC, Conaway JW: Characterization of Cullin-box sequences that direct recruitment of Cul2-Rbx1 and Cul5-Rbx2 modules to Elongin BC-based ubiquitin ligases. J Biol Chem. 2008, 283: 8005-8013. 10.1074/jbc.M706987200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Stanley BJ, Ehrlich ES, Short L, Yu Y, Xiao Z, Yu XF, Xiong Y: Structural insight into the human immunodeficiency virus Vif SOCS box and its role in human E3 ubiquitin ligase assembly. J Virol. 2008, 82: 8656-8663. 10.1128/JVI.00767-08.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Dias DC, Dolios G, Wang R, Pan ZQ: CUL7: A DOC domain-containing cullin selectively binds Skp1.Fbx29 to form an SCF-like complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 16601-16606. 10.1073/pnas.252646399.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Hotton SK, Callis J: Regulation of cullin RING ligases. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008, 59: 467-489. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.58.032806.104011.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Koepp DM, Harper JW, Elledge SJ: How the cyclin became a cyclin: regulated proteolysis in the cell cycle. Cell. 1999, 14: 431-434.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Guardavaccaro D, Pagano M: Stabilizers and destabilizers controlling cell cycle oscillators. Mol Cell. 2006, 22: 1-4. 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.03.017.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Welcker M, Clurman BE: FBW7 ubiquitin ligase: a tumour suppressor at the crossroads of cell division, growth and differentiation. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008, 8: 83-93. 10.1038/nrc2290.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhong W, Feng H, Santiago FE, Kipreos ET: CUL-4 ubiquitin ligase maintains genome stability by restraining DNA-replication licensing. Nature. 2003, 423: 885-889. 10.1038/nature01747.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Kapitsinou PP, Haase VH: The VHL tumor suppressor and HIF: insights from genetic studies in mice. Cell Death Differ. 2008, 15: 650-659. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4402313.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Huber C, Dias-Santagata D, Glaser A, O'Sullivan J, Brauner R, Wu K, Xu X, Pearce K, Wang R, Uzielli ML, Huber C, Dias-Santagata D, Glaser A, O'Sullivan J, Brauner R, Wu K, Xu X, Pearce K, Wang R, Uzielli ML, Dagoneau N, Chemaitilly W, Superti-Furga A, Dos Santos H, Mégarbané A, Morin G, Gillessen-Kaesbach G, Hennekam R, Van der Burgt I, Black GC, et al: Identification of mutations in CUL7 in 3-M syndrome. Nat Genet. 2005, 37: 1119-1124. 10.1038/ng1628.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Huber C, Delezoide AL, Guimiot F, Baumann C, Malan V, Le Merrer M, Da Silva DB, Bonneau D, Chatelain P, Chu C, Clark R, Cox H, Edery P, Edouard T, Fano V, Gibson K, Gillessen-Kaesbach G, Giovannucci-Uzielli ML, Graul-Neumann LM, van Hagen JM, van Hest L, Horovitz D, Melki J, Partsch CJ, Plauchu H, Rajab A, Rossi M, Sillence D, Steichen-Gersdorf E, Stewart H, et al: A large-scale mutation search reveals genetic heterogeneity in 3M syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009, 17: 395-400. 10.1038/ejhg.2008.200.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Maksimova N, Hara K, Miyashia A, Nikolaeva I, Shiga A, Nogovicina A, Sukhomyasova A, Argunov V, Shvedova A, Ikeuchi T, Nishizawa M, Kuwano R, Onodera O: Clinical, molecular and histopathological features of short stature syndrome with novel CUL7 mutation in Yakuts: new population isolate in Asia. J Med Genet. 2007, 44: 772-778. 10.1136/jmg.2007.051979.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Okabe H, Lee SH, Phuchareon J, Albertson DG, McCormick F, Tetsu O: A critical role for FBXW8 and MAPK in cyclin D1 degradation and cancer cell proliferation. PLoS One. 2006, 1: e128-10.1371/journal.pone.0000128.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Xu X, Sarikas A, Dias-Santagata DC, Dolios G, Lafontant PJ, Tsai SC, Zhu W, Nakajima H, Nakajima HO, Field LJ, Wang R, Pan ZQ: The CUL7 E3 ubiquitin ligase targets insulin receptor substrate 1 for ubiquitin-dependent degradation. Mol Cell. 2008, 30: 403-414. 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.03.009.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Sarikas A, Xu X, Field LJ, Pan ZQ: The cullin7 E3 ubiquitin ligase: a novel player in growth control. Cell Cycle. 2008, 7: 3154-3161. 10.4161/cc.7.20.6922.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Tarpey PS, Raymond FL, O'Meara S, Edkins S, Teague J, Butler A, Dicks E, Stevens C, Tofts C, Avis T, Barthorpe S, Buck G, Cole J, Gray K, Halliday K, Harrison R, Hills K, Jenkinson A, Jones D, Menzies A, Mironenko T, Perry J, Raine K, Richardson D, Shepherd R, Small A, Varian J, West S, Widaa S, Mallya U, et al: Mutations in CUL4B, which encodes a ubiquitin E3 ligase subunit, cause an X-linked mental retardation syndrome associated with aggressive outbursts, seizures, relative macrocephaly, central obesity, hypogonadism, pes cavus, and tremor. Am J Hum Genet. 2007, 80: 345-352. 10.1086/511134.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Skaar JR, D'Angiolella V, Pagan JK, Pagano M: SnapShot: F Box Proteins II. Cell. 2009, 137: 1358-1358.e1PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Pintard L, Willems A, Peter M: Cullin-based ubiquitin ligases: Cul3-BTB complexes join the family. EMBO J. 2004, 23: 1681-1687. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600186.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Jackson S, Xiong Y: CRL4s: the CUL4-RING E3 ubiquitin ligases. Trends Biochem Sci. 2009, 34: 562-570. 10.1016/j.tibs.2009.07.002.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Lee J, Zhou P: DCAFs, the missing link of the CUL4-DDB1 ubiquitin ligase. Mol Cell. 2007, 26: 775-780. 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.06.001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Pan ZQ, Kentsis A, Dias DC, Yamoah K, Wu K: Nedd8 on cullin: building an expressway to protein destruction. Oncogene. 2004, 23: 1985-1997. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207414.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Yamoah K, Oashi T, Sarikas A, Gazdoiu S, Osman R, Pan ZQ: Autoinhibitory regulation of SCF-mediated ubiquitination by human cullin 1's C-terminal tail. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008, 105: 12230-12235. 10.1073/pnas.0806155105.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Duda DM, Borg LA, Scott DC, Hunt HW, Hammel M, Schulman BA: Structural insights into NEDD8 activation of cullin-RING ligases: conformational control of conjugation. Cell. 2008, 134: 995-1006. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.022.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Saha A, Deshaies RJ: Multimodal activation of the ubiquitin ligase SCF by Nedd8 conjugation. Mol Cell. 2008, 32: 21-31. 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.08.021.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Cope GA, Suh GS, Aravind L, Schwarz SE, Zipursky SL, Koonin EV, Deshaies RJ: Role of predicted metalloprotease motif of Jab1/Csn5 in cleavage of Nedd8 from Cul1. Science. 2002, 298: 608-611. 10.1126/science.1075901.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Wei N, Chamovitz DA, Deng XW: Arabidopsis COP9 is a component of a novel signaling complex mediating light control of development. Cell. 1994, 78: 117-124. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90578-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Read MA, Brownell JE, Gladysheva TB, Hottelet M, Parent LA, Coggins MB, Pierce JW, Podust VN, Luo RS, Chau V, Palombella VJ: Nedd8 modification of cul-1 activates SCF(beta(TrCP))-dependent ubiquitination of IkappaBalpha. Mol Cell Biol. 2000, 20: 2326-2333. 10.1128/MCB.20.7.2326-2333.2000.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Liu J, Furukawa M, Matsumoto T, Xiong Y: NEDD8 modification of CUL1 dissociates p120(CAND1), an inhibitor of CUL1-SKP1 binding and SCF ligases. Mol Cell. 2002, 10: 1511-1518. 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00783-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Zheng J, Yang X, Harrell JM, Ryzhikov S, Shim EH, Lykke-Andersen K, Wei N, Sun H, Kobayashi R, Zhang H: CAND1 binds to unneddylated CUL1 and regulates the formation of SCF ubiquitin E3 ligase complex. Mol Cell. 2002, 10: 1519-1526. 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00784-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Goldenberg SJ, Cascio TC, Shumway SD, Garbutt KC, Liu J, Xiong Y, Zheng N: Structure of the Cand1-Cul1-Roc1 complex reveals regulatory mechanisms for the assembly of the multisubunit cullin-dependent ubiquitin ligases. Cell. 2004, 119: 517-528. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.10.019.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Bennett EJ, Rush J, Gygi SP, Harper JW: Dynamics of cullin-RING ubiquitin ligase network revealed by systematic quantitative proteomics. Cell. 2010, 143: 951-965. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.11.017.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Yen HC, Xu Q, Chou DM, Zhao Z, Elledge SJ: Global protein stability profiling in mammalian cells. Science. 2008, 322: 918-923. 10.1126/science.1160489.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Mizushima T, Hirao T, Yoshida Y, Lee SJ, Chiba T, Iwai K, Yamaguchi Y, Kato K, Tsukihara T, Tanaka K: Structural basis of sugar-recognizing ubiquitin ligase. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2004, 11: 365-370. 10.1038/nsmb732.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Hoeller D, Dikic I: Targeting the ubiquitin system in cancer therapy. Nature. 2009, 458: 438-444. 10.1038/nature07960.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Navon A, Ciechanover A: The 26 S proteasome: from basic mechanisms to drug targeting. J Biol Chem. 2009, 284: 33713-33718. 10.1074/jbc.R109.018481.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Soucy TA, Smith PG, Milhollen MA, Berger AJ, Gavin JM, Adhikari S, Brownell JE, Burke KE, Cardin DP, Critchley S, Cullis CA, Doucette A, Garnsey JJ, Gaulin JL, Gershman RE, Lublinsky AR, McDonald A, Mizutani H, Narayanan U, Olhava EJ, Peluso S, Rezaei M, Sintchak MD, Talreja T, Thomas MP, Traore T, Vyskocil S, Weatherhead GS, Yu J, Zhang J, et al: An inhibitor of NEDD8-activating enzyme as a new approach to treat cancer. Nature. 2009, 458: 732-736. 10.1038/nature07884.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Aghajan M, Jonai N, Flick K, Fu F, Luo M, Cai X, Ouni I, Pierce N, Tang X, Lomenick B, Damoiseaux R, Hao R, Del Moral PM, Verma R, Li Y, Li C, Houk KN, Jung ME, Zheng N, Huang L, Deshaies RJ, Kaiser P, Huang J: Chemical genetics screen for enhancers of rapamycin identifies a specific inhibitor of an SCF family E3 ubiquitin ligase. Nat Biotechnol. 2010, 28: 738-742. 10.1038/nbt.1645.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Orlicky S, Tang X, Neduva V, Elowe N, Brown ED, Sicheri F, Tyers M: An allosteric inhibitor of substrate recognition by the SCF(Cdc4) ubiquitin ligase. Nat Biotechnol. 2010, 28: 733-737. 10.1038/nbt.1646.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Li W, Bengtson MH, Ulbrich A, Matsuda A, Reddy VA, Orth A, Chanda SK, Batalov S, Joazeiro CA: Genome-wide and functional annotation of human E3 ubiquitin ligases identifies MULAN, a mitochondrial E3 that regulates the organelle's dynamics and signaling. PLoS One. 2008, 3: e1487-10.1371/journal.pone.0001487.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Komander D: The emerging complexity of protein ubiquitination. Biochem Soc Trans. 2009, 37: 937-953. 10.1042/BST0370937.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Chen ZJ, Sun LJ: Nonproteolytic functions of ubiquitin in cell signaling. Mol Cell. 2009, 33: 275-286. 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.01.014.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Haglund K, Sigismund S, Polo S, Szymkiewicz I, Di Fiore PP, Dikic I: Multiple monoubiquitination of RTKs is sufficient for their endocytosis and degradation. Nat Cell Biol. 2003, 5: 461-466. 10.1038/ncb983.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Pickart CM: Mechanisms underlying ubiquitination. Annu Rev Biochem. 2001, 70: 503-533. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.70.1.503.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Ardley HC, Robinson PA: E3 ubiquitin ligases. Essays Biochem. 2005, 41: 15-30. 10.1042/EB0410015.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Entrez Gene. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene]
  60. Schulman BA, Carrano AC, Jeffrey PD, Bowen Z, Kinnucan ER, Finnin MS, Elledge SJ, Harper JW, Pagano M, Pavletich NP: Insights into SCF ubiquitin ligases from the structure of the Skp1-Skp2 complex. Nature. 2000, 408: 381-386. 10.1038/35042620.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Stebbins CE, Kaelin WG, Pavletich NP: Structure of the VHL-ElonginC-ElonginB complex: implications for VHL tumor suppressor function. Science. 1999, 284: 455-461. 10.1126/science.284.5413.455.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Pintard L, Willis JH, Willems A, Johnson JL, Srayko M, Kurz T, Glaser S, Mains PE, Tyers M, Bowerman B, Peter M: The BTB protein MEL-26 is a substrate-specific adaptor of the CUL-3 ubiquitin-ligase. Nature. 2003, 425: 311-316. 10.1038/nature01959.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Bullock AN, Debreczeni JE, Edwards AM, Sundstrom M, Knapp S: Crystal structure of the SOCS2-elongin C-elongin B complex defines a prototypical SOCS box ubiquitin ligase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006, 103: 7637-7642. 10.1073/pnas.0601638103.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Yu Y, Xiao Z, Ehrlich ES, Yu X, Yu XF: Selective assembly of HIV-1 Vif-Cul5-ElonginB-ElonginC E3 ubiquitin ligase complex through a novel SOCS box and upstream cysteines. Genes Dev. 2004, 18: 2867-2872. 10.1101/gad.1250204.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Kaustov L, Lukin J, Lemak A, Duan S, Ho M, Doherty R, Penn LZ, Arrowsmith CH: The conserved CPH domains of Cul7 and PARC are protein-protein interaction modules that bind the tetramerization domain of p53. J Biol Chem. 2007, 282: 11300-11307. 10.1074/jbc.M611297200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Dealy MJ, Nguyen KV, Lo J, Gstaiger M, Krek W, Elson D, Arbeit J, Kipreos ET, Johnson RS: Loss of Cul1 results in early embryonic lethality and dysregulation of cyclin E. Nat Genet. 1999, 23: 245-248. 10.1038/13886.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Wang Y, Penfold S, Tang X, Hattori N, Riley P, Harper JW, Cross JC, Tyers M: Deletion of the Cul1 gene in mice causes arrest in early embryogenesis and accumulation of cyclin E. Curr Biol. 1999, 9: 1191-1194. 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)80024-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Gao MX, Liao EH, Yu B, Wang Y, Zhen M, Derry WB: The SCF FSN-1 ubiquitin ligase controls germline apoptosis through CEP-1/p53 in C. elegans. Cell Death Differ. 2008, 15: 1054-1062. 10.1038/cdd.2008.30.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Killian DJ, Harvey E, Johnson P, Otori M, Mitani S, Xue D: SKR-1, a homolog of Skp1 and a member of the SCF(SEL-10) complex, regulates sex-determination and LIN-12/Notch signaling in C. elegans. Dev Biol. 2008, 322: 322-331. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.07.035.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Koepp DM, Schaefer LK, Ye X, Keyomarsi K, Chu C, Harper JW, Elledge SJ: Phosphorylation-dependent ubiquitination of cyclin E by the SCFFbw7 ubiquitin ligase. Science. 2001, 294: 173-177. 10.1126/science.1065203.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Moberg KH, Bell DW, Wahrer DC, Haber DA, Hariharan IK: Archipelago regulates Cyclin E levels in Drosophila and is mutated in human cancer cell lines. Nature. 2001, 413: 311-316. 10.1038/35095068.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Wing JP, Schreader BA, Yokokura T, Wang Y, Andrews PS, Huseinovic N, Dong CK, Ogdahl JL, Schwartz LM, White K, Nambu JR: Drosophila Morgue is an F box/ubiquitin conjugase domain protein important for grim-reaper mediated apoptosis. Nat Cell Biol. 2002, 4: 451-456. 10.1038/ncb800.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Ou CY, Lin YF, Chen YJ, Chien CT: Distinct protein degradation mechanisms mediated by Cul1 and Cul3 controlling Ci stability in Drosophila eye development. Genes Dev. 2002, 16: 2403-2414. 10.1101/gad.1011402.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Feng H, Zhong W, Punkosdy G, Gu S, Zhou L, Seabolt EK, Kipreos ET: CUL-2 is required for the G1-to-S-phase transition and mitotic chromosome condensation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Cell Biol. 1999, 1: 486-492. 10.1038/70272.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Sasagawa Y, Kikuchi K, Dazai K, Higashitani A: Caenorhabditis elegans Elongin BC complex is essential for cell proliferation and chromosome condensation and segregation during mitosis and meiotic division II. Chromosome Res. 2005, 13: 357-375. 10.1007/s10577-005-2687-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. DeRenzo C, Reese KJ, Seydoux G: Exclusion of germ plasm proteins from somatic lineages by cullin-dependent degradation. Nature. 2003, 424: 685-689. 10.1038/nature01887.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Liu J, Vasudevan S, Kipreos ET: CUL-2 and ZYG-11 promote meiotic anaphase II and the proper placement of the anterior-posterior axis in C. elegans. Development. 2004, 131: 3513-3525. 10.1242/dev.01245.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Sonneville R, Gonczy P: Zyg-11 and cul-2 regulate progression through meiosis II and polarity establishment in C. elegans. Development. 2004, 131: 3527-3543. 10.1242/dev.01244.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Vasudevan S, Starostina NG, Kipreos ET: The Caenorhabditis elegans cell-cycle regulator ZYG-11 defines a conserved family of CUL-2 complex components. EMBO Rep. 2007, 8: 279-286. 10.1038/sj.embor.7400895.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Sasagawa Y, Sato S, Ogura T, Higashitani A: C. elegans RBX-2-CUL-5- and RBX-1-CUL-2-based complexes are redundant for oogenesis and activation of the MAP kinase MPK-1. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581: 145-150. 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.12.009.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Epstein AC, Gleadle JM, McNeill LA, Hewitson KS, O'Rourke J, Mole DR, Mukherji M, Metzen E, Wilson MI, Dhanda A, Tian YM, Masson N, Hamilton DL, Jaakkola P, Barstead R, Hodgkin J, Maxwell PH, Pugh CW, Schofield CJ, Ratcliffe PJ: C. elegans EGL-9 and mammalian homologs define a family of dioxygenases that regulate HIF by prolyl hydroxylation. Cell. 2001, 107: 43-54. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00507-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Mehta R, Steinkraus KA, Sutphin GL, Ramos FJ, Shamieh LS, Huh A, Davis C, Chandler-Brown D, Kaeberlein M: Proteasomal regulation of the hypoxic response modulates aging in C. elegans. Science. 2009, 324: 1196-1198. 10.1126/science.1173507.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Singer JD, Gurian-West M, Clurman B, Roberts JM: Cullin-3 targets cyclin E for ubiquitination and controls S phase in mammalian cells. Genes Dev. 1999, 13: 2375-2387. 10.1101/gad.13.18.2375.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Pintard L, Kurz T, Glaser S, Willis JH, Peter M, Bowerman B: Neddylation and deneddylation of CUL-3 is required to target MEI-1/Katanin for degradation at the meiosis-to-mitosis transition in C. elegans. Curr Biol. 2003, 13: 911-921. 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00336-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Luke-Glaser S, Pintard L, Tyers M, Peter M: The AAA-ATPase FIGL-1 controls mitotic progression, and its levels are regulated by the CUL-3MEL-26 E3 ligase in the C. elegans germ line. J Cell Sci. 2007, 120: 3179-3187. 10.1242/jcs.015883.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Johnson JL, Lu C, Raharjo E, McNally K, McNally FJ, Mains PE: Levels of the ubiquitin ligase substrate adaptor MEL-26 are inversely correlated with MEI-1/katanin microtubule-severing activity during both meiosis and mitosis. Dev Biol. 2009, 330: 349-357. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.04.004.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Mistry H, Wilson BA, Roberts IJ, O'Kane CJ, Skeath JB: Cullin-3 regulates pattern formation, external sensory organ development and cell survival during Drosophila development. Mech Dev. 2004, 121: 1495-1507. 10.1016/j.mod.2004.07.007.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. Zhu S, Perez R, Pan M, Lee T: Requirement of Cul3 for axonal arborization and dendritic elaboration in Drosophila mushroom body neurons. J Neurosci. 2005, 25: 4189-4197. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0149-05.2005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  89. Zhang Q, Zhang L, Wang B, Ou CY, Chien CT, Jiang J: A hedgehog-induced BTB protein modulates hedgehog signaling by degrading Ci/Gli transcription factor. Dev Cell. 2006, 10: 719-729. 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.05.004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  90. Ou CY, Wang CH, Jiang J, Chien CT: Suppression of Hedgehog signaling by Cul3 ligases in proliferation control of retinal precursors. Dev Biol. 2007, 308: 106-119. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.05.008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  91. Chen Y, Yang Z, Meng M, Zhao Y, Dong N, Yan H, Liu L, Ding M, Peng HB, Shao F: Cullin mediates degradation of RhoA through evolutionarily conserved BTB adaptors to control actin cytoskeleton structure and cell movement. Mol Cell. 2009, 35: 841-855. 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  92. Hudson AM, Cooley L: Drosophila Kelch functions with Cullin-3 to organize the ring canal actin cytoskeleton. J Cell Biol. 2010, 188: 29-37.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  93. Liu L, Lee S, Zhang J, Peters SB, Hannah J, Zhang Y, Yin Y, Koff A, Ma L, Zhou P: CUL4A abrogation augments DNA damage response and protection against skin carcinogenesis. Mol Cell. 2009, 34: 451-460. 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.04.020.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Higa LA, Yang X, Zheng J, Banks D, Wu M, Ghosh P, Sun H, Zhang H: Involvement of CUL4 ubiquitin E3 ligases in regulating CDK inhibitors Dacapo/p27Kip1 and cyclin E degradation. Cell Cycle. 2006, 5: 71-77. 10.4161/cc.5.1.2266.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  95. Higa LA, Banks D, Wu M, Kobayashi R, Sun H, Zhang H: L2DTL/CDT2 interacts with the CUL4/DDB1 complex and PCNA and regulates CDT1 proteolysis in response to DNA damage. Cell Cycle. 2006, 5: 1675-1680. 10.4161/cc.5.15.3149.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  96. Ayyub C, Sen A, Gonsalves F, Badrinath K, Bhandari P, Shashidhara LS, Krishna S, Rodrigues V: Cullin-5 plays multiple roles in cell fate specification and synapse formation during Drosophila development. Dev Dyn. 2005, 232: 865-875. 10.1002/dvdy.20322.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  97. Kugler JM, Lem C, Lasko P: Reduced cul-5 activity causes aberrant follicular morphogenesis and germ cell loss in Drosophila oogenesis. PLoS One. 2010, 5: e9048-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  98. Arai T, Kasper JS, Skaar JR, Ali SH, Takahashi C, DeCaprio JA: Targeted disruption of p185/Cul7 gene results in abnormal vascular morphogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 9855-9860. 10.1073/pnas.1733908100.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  99. Skaar JR, Arai T, DeCaprio JA: Dimerization of CUL7 and PARC is not required for all CUL7 functions and mouse development. Mol Cell Biol. 2005, 25: 5579-5589. 10.1128/MCB.25.13.5579-5589.2005.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© BioMed Central Ltd 2011

Comments