Genome-wide patterns of genetic variation in sweet and grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)
- Lei-Ying Zheng†1,
- Xiao-Sen Guo†2,
- Bing He†2,
- Lian-Jun Sun†1,
- Yao Peng2,
- Shan-Shan Dong2,
- Teng-Fei Liu2,
- Shuye Jiang1, 3,
- Srinivasan Ramachandran1, 3,
- Chun-Ming Liu1 and
- Hai-Chun Jing1Email author
© Zheng et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd 2011
Received: 11 April 2011
Accepted: 21 November 2011
Published: 21 November 2011
Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) is globally produced as a source of food, feed, fiber and fuel. Grain and sweet sorghums differ in a number of important traits, including stem sugar and juice accumulation, plant height as well as grain and biomass production. The first whole genome sequence of a grain sorghum is available, but additional genome sequences are required to study genome-wide and intraspecific variation for dissecting the genetic basis of these important traits and for tailor-designed breeding of this important C4 crop.
We resequenced two sweet and one grain sorghum inbred lines, and identified a set of nearly 1,500 genes differentiating sweet and grain sorghum. These genes fall into ten major metabolic pathways involved in sugar and starch metabolisms, lignin and coumarin biosynthesis, nucleic acid metabolism, stress responses and DNA damage repair. In addition, we uncovered 1,057,018 SNPs, 99,948 indels of 1 to 10 bp in length and 16,487 presence/absence variations as well as 17,111 copy number variations. The majority of the large-effect SNPs, indels and presence/absence variations resided in the genes containing leucine rich repeats, PPR repeats and disease resistance R genes possessing diverse biological functions or under diversifying selection, but were absent in genes that are essential for life.
This is a first report of the identification of genome-wide patterns of genetic variation in sorghum. High-density SNP and indel markers reported here will be a valuable resource for future gene-phenotype studies and the molecular breeding of this important crop and related species.
Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) originated from Africa and is a pro-poor multipurpose crop providing food, feed, fiber and fuel across a range of agro-ecosystems, especially in those with fragile conditions. Food and Agriculture Organization data show that sorghum is currently the number five most important grain crop and, in the past decade, its yearly production has been stabilized at 60 million tonnes with a harvesting area of 44 million hectares. Sorghum is known as 'the camel amongst crops' and requires much less water than many other cereals and has a remarkable ability to produce a crop under low levels of inputs and adverse stress conditions. Sweet sorghum is a natural variant of common grain sorghum with high stem sugar content and often considered a smart crop because it can produce both food and fuel. As a C4 crop with a high level of directly fermentable stem sugars and the ability to produce high biomass under adverse conditions, sweet sorghum is considered an ideal biofuel crop for the first and second generation bioethanol production, particularly having the advantages of exploitation of marginal land and avoiding competing for land for food crops [1–3]. However, the genetic basis for these remarkable traits of sweet sorghum is poorly understood.
Genetic variation consists of sequence variation and structure alteration. Sequence variation normally is manifested by SNPs, short sequence insertions and deletions (indels), microsatellites or simple sequence repeats, and transposable elements. The importance of SNPs and indels was initially realized by the occurrence of human sickle-cell anemia and cystic fibrosis diseases, the dramatic consequences caused by a nucleotide change in the hemoglobin beta gene  and a three-base deletion in the gene encoding a cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator [5–7], respectively. Structural alteration is generally described as presence/absence variations (PAVs) and copy number variations (CNVs), which include large scale deletions, insertions, duplications, inversions and translocations. An effect of CNV on phenotypic variation was documented 75 years ago in Drosophila melanogaster, with the Bar eye phenotype being caused by the Bar gene duplication [8, 9]. In plants, sequence polymorphisms have gained much interest in the academic and breeding communities [10–12]. In several model and crop plants, including Arabidopsis, rice and maize, whole genome SNPs and indels have been developed [13–16] for a broad range of functional and evolutionary studies, including association mapping [17, 18], genetic diversity [19, 20], domestication, and genome evolution [21–23]. The effects of CNVs in plant genomes have only been reported in a few cases. In Arabidopsis and rice, array-comparative genome hybridization has been used to examine single-feature polymorphisms [24, 25], genomic lesions caused by mutagenesis , as well as natural variation . In maize, structural alterations have been reported to violate the intraspecific genome co-linearity [28, 29] and contribute to the diversity of a range of important traits, such as heterosis and disease responses [22, 30, 31]. CNVs also shape the genome diversity of progeny of the immediate next generations in Arabidopsis . Nonetheless, CNVs and their importance in plant genome and phenotypic variation are still far from well explored.
S. bicolor has three subspecies, namely arundinaceum, bicolor and drummondii, and the cultivated sorghums are all from bicolor, which has five local races, bicolor, caudatum, durra, guinea and kafir . Although sweet sorghum differs phenotypically from grain sorghum and tends to have a sugar-rich juicy stem, taller plant, higher biomass but less grain production [1, 34], how sweet sorghum differs genetically from grain sorghum is not well defined [35, 36]. Sweet sorghum was found in several local races of bicolor subspecies , which raises questions about the origin, selection and genetic and genomic basis of sweet sorghum. To address these questions, knowledge about the genome-wide genetic variation between sweet and grain sorghum is required. Such knowledge will also be useful for genetic improvement and tailor-designed breeding of this important crop [38, 39]. The availability of the first whole genome sequences for a grain sorghum, BTx623 , has provided a template for genome-wide analysis of genetic variation. However, without additional genomes in the same species it is difficult to access hidden genome variation information. We took a next generation sequencing technology and resequenced two sweet and one grain sorghum genomes to identify patterns of sequence polymorphism and structural variation in comparison with the published BTx623 genome. This effort identified a large quantity of SNPs, indels, PAVs and CNVs in sorghum. Comparison of these variation data defined potential genome regions and metabolic pathways associated with sweet- and biofuel-associated traits. The large genome resources provided here are useful for comparative genomics and crop breeding in sorghum and related species.
The morphological and physiological characteristics of sorghum lines used for resequencing
Sorghum (S. bicolor) accessions Keller, E-Tian, Ji2731 and the reference accession BTx623 were used for this work. Keller is an American-bred elite sweet sorghum line and has been shown to have good performance across a range of environmental conditions . E-Tian (literally meaning Russian Sweet in Chinese) was a sweet sorghum line introduced to China in the early 1970s, while Ji2731 is a representative Chinese kaoliang grain sorghum well adapted to the northeast part of China with good seedling establishment and a short growth period.
Agronomic and biofuel-associated traits of the sorghum lines used for resequencing
Plant height (cm)
136.3 ± 9.7
235.6 ± 17.1
381.4 + 26.2
268.0 ± 12.5
12.2 ± 1.2
17.5 + 2.5
15.4 + 2.1
Stem weight (g)
165.0 ± 35.4
252.0 + 42.4
635.0 + 84.9
457.2 + 166.5
Stem diameter (cm)
1.5 ± 0.2
1.5 ± 0.1
1.6 + 0.2
1.4 ± 0.3
8.2 ± 0.4
10.7 ± 0.5
13.0 + 0.7
10.9 ± 0.3
Leaf weight (g)
73.4 ± 23.5
70.8 ± 10.9
165.0 + 24.7
79.6 ± 22.1
Panicle length (cm)
26.7 ± 2.8
18.1 ± 1.1
24.2 + 1.8
22.9 ± 2.0
Panicle weight (g)
83.0 ± 14.1
98.4 ± 10.5
58 + 10.6
88.0 + 32.0
Peduncle length (cm)
41.3 ± 2.9
21.1 ± 3.7
56.7 + 3.4
39.9 ± 1.9
Short-read resequencing and landscape of genome variation
A whole-genome shotgun strategy and Illumina Genome Analyser sequencing technology were employed. The genome size of the reference genome BTx623 is 738,787,382, of which the effective size is 697,579,688 (excluding the N bases). We estimated that a 10 × genome coverage should be sufficient for aligning most of the sequences. Nine paired-end sequencing libraries with an insert size around 500 bp, three for each sorghum line, were constructed using DNA samples from 10-day-old etiolated seedlings. Resequencing yielded 620.72 million 44-bp paired-end reads, which comprised 27.31 Gb of high-quality raw data. Sequence reads were aligned to the reference BTx623 genome using SOAP software v2.21 . In total, we achieved an effective depth of ×36.51 coverage, with an average of ×12.17 for each line (Table S1 in Additional file 1).
Sanger sequencing technology was used for targeted gene verification. Primer sequences spanning genomic regions predicted to contain genetic variation were used to amplify genomic DNA templates from the three sorghum lines. In this manner, 215 SNPs in 30 genes were selected and 213 were verified using this method, suggesting a prediction accuracy of over 99% (Additional file 3). Similar accuracy was obtained with 48 indels and 9 CNVs.
Because some newly identified genes might exist beyond the currently assembled BTx623 sorghum genome, we assembled unmapped reads with SOAPdenovo and obtained contigs with a total sequence length of 7.2 Mb. Annotation of these contigs showed 73 putative absent genes with an average length of 409 bp (only coding regions were considered; Table S8 in Additional file 1). A Blast search against Arabidopsis, rice and maize genome databases revealed that 33 of these genes showed homology with known proteins (E-value < 1e-6).
SNP annotations and large-effect SNPs
SNPs are small differences but with great impact on the variation of genomes and the biological traits. We therefore looked into the SNP annotations in detail and paid special attention to those in genic regions. For this purpose, the newly sequenced grain sorghum BTx623 genome was used as a reference . Bearing in mind that all genome annotations, including that of sorghum, are imperfect and many factors affect the analysis of effects of SNPs - especially the presence of abundant transposon elements in the sorghum genome, which can be difficult to detect when they are present in low copy numbers, are even expressed, or contain fragments of 'real' genes - we analyzed the effects of SNPs using four different gene categories: bona fide genes, low-confidence genes, pseudogenes and transposons. We retrieved gene models of the Btx623 genome from the Phytozome database , and verified the gene identities using EST information from PlantGDB and maize gene orthologues from MaizeGDB . In the end, the gene sets included 27,640 bona fide genes, 5,197 low-confidence genes, 932 transposons and 727 pseudogenes, respectively. These genes fall into 2,637 Pfam families (Additional file 4).
Number and distribution of coding region SNPs in the resequenced sorghum genomes
Low confidence genes
Number and distribution of coding region SNPs in Pfam domain-containing genes in the resequenced sorghum genomes
Low confidence genes
Taken together, we have identified large sets of SNPs, some of which are useful for further downstream functional genomics analyses if the SNPs reside in bona fide genes (SNPs residing in non-functional genes or transposon elements can also be useful as molecular markers). However, these results should be viewed with caution at this stage. As the identification of large-effect SNPs depends on the annotation of gene models, the exact number and spectrum of such SNPs will probably be modified when the genome annotation is updated. Furthermore, the sorghum lines used for genome resequencing differ in many traits, and the results may be biased towards having more large-effect SNPs. It would be interesting to include sorghum lines that closely phenotypically resemble each other for comparison. Finally, we analyzed only a limited number of sorghum lines; a representative collection of sorghum lines is required to justify the results obtained.
Effects of indels and presence/absence variations
We further analyzed the Pfam domains affected by indels. Similar to the situation of non-synonymous SNPs, indels were statistically significantly (P-value < 0.001) enriched in NB-ARC and leucine rich repeat domain genes (Table S11 in Additional file 1). Indels were also found enriched in F-box, protein kinase and tyrosine kinase gene families, which are known to possess diverse functions and are suspected to follow a rapid birth-death cycle [47–49]. Although in theory the effects of frame-shifting (1-, 2-, 4-, 5-, 7-, 8- and 10-bp) indels are different from those of non-frame-shift (3-, 6- and 9-bp) ones, we found that, in sorghum, the gene families affected by them were very similar (Additional file 6). PAVs were highly enriched (P-value < 0.001) in nine gene families, some of which, such as NB-ARC domain genes, are the same as those enriched in SNPs and indels (Additional file 6).
Genes with copy number variations
The annotation showed that 2,600 genes had 3,234 CNVs, and 32 genes had CNVs in all three sorghum lines. Some of these 32 genes encode proteins involved in basic biological functions, such as RNA polymerase beta subunit (Sb04g009441, Sb04g009491, Sb02g017833), NADH dehydrogenase subunit 6 (Sb10g008595), ribosomal protein S7 (Sb05g020390) and ribosomal protein S18 (Sb02g032062). One gene, Sb04g035450, was found to be lost in Keller and E-Tian, but gained extra copies in Ji2731. A blast revealed that it is a homologue of the glutamate-gated kainate-type ion channel receptor subunit gene GluR5. Gene family enrichment analysis showed that CNVs were statistically significantly (P-value < 0.001) enriched in genes encoding cellulose synthases, pectinesterases, GRAS transcription factors, and BTB/POZ and auxin responsive proteins, in addition to the DUF, leucine-rich repeat and the zinc knuckle proteins (Additional file 2).
Genetic variation between sweet and grain sorghum
We speculated that some of the identified genetic variation might contribute to the phenotypic differentiation of sweet- and biofuel-associated traits and focused our analysis on SNPs, indels and PAVs in genic regions. For this, we used the gene set of the reference BTx623 genome as the control and identified all the shared variation within the two sweet sorghum lines and the variation between the reference genome and the Chinese local grain sorghum, respectively. Subsequently, the two sets of data were compared to remove those genes that have large-effect SNPs in the Chinese local grain sorghum, and the remaining gene set considered as those differentiating sweet and grain sorghum. We selected SNPs that are non-synonymous in the two sweet sorghum lines Keller and E-Tian but synonymous or even not present in the grain sorghum line Ji2731 (the reference BTx623 is a grain sorghum line). Similarly, for indels and PAVs, we selected those that were identified in both the Keller and E-Tian lines but not in Ji2731 and a gene was considered the putative differentiating gene when one indel was mapped to the coding region of the gene or the coding region of the gene was affected by a PAV.
Pathways statistically significantly (P-value < 0.1) enriched in the sweet-related gene set
Starch and sucrose metabolism
alpha-Linolenic acid metabolism
Regulation of autophagy
Rapid development of sequencing technologies and bioinformatic tools makes the complete genome sequencing of many species possible, which provides a starting point to unravel the tremendous genetic variation and diversity at the genome scale. Amongst several model organisms examined to date, such as human, mouse, Arabidopsis, rice, and maize, genome-wide patterns of genetic variation are able to be captured by sampling a relatively small number of genomes [14, 20, 50–52]. By resequencing two sweet and one grain sorghum inbred lines, we uncovered nearly two million SNPs and indels, along with large numbers of PAVs and CNVs. This is a first report on the genome-wide patterns of genetic variation in sorghum, which will be valuable for further genotype-phenotype studies and for molecular breeding of this important C4 model crop.
Our study shows that the proportions of genic SNPs identified as in coding regions, intronic regions, or UTRs are 42.3%, 50.2%, and 7.5%, respectively. Compared to Arabidopsis  and rice [14, 20], the intronic regions of sorghum genes harbor more SNPs. This might be related to the increased size of the introns; the average intron size for Arabidopsis is 168 bp, and for rice it is 397 bp, but for sorghum it is 444 bp. Our results also demonstrate that, in sorghum, the proportions of large-effect SNPs resulting in premature stop codons, alteration of initiation methionine residues and disruption of splicing donor or acceptor sites are remarkably similar to what have been reported so far in Arabidopsis  and maize , but different from rice . Furthermore, we found that 16 SNPs removed annotated stop codons and resulted in longer open reading frames, which is substantially smaller than the number (1,087) in maize.
It is known that transposon elements are abundant in sorghum as well as other cereal genomes [40, 53]. As the genome annotation is not perfect, caution should be exercised with regard to the analysis of the effects of SNPs. Indeed, we found that the transposase genes, pseudogenes and low-confidence genes tended to have high non-synonymous-to-synonymous ratios in comparison with bona fide genes. This was reflected in the Pfam SNP annotations as well as in the analysis of so-called large-effect SNPs, which are predicted to disable gene functions. Most of the SNPs resided in receptor-like kinases, PPR repeats, disease resistant NB-ARC genes and other genes with multiple effects on stress responses. These genes also exhibited high non-synonymous-to-synonymous ratios, further supporting the notion from studies in other species that an arms race between plant-pathogen interactions results in diversification of the pathogen- or microbe-associated molecular pattern recognition receptors in plant genomes [54, 55]. Significantly, the highest non-synonymous substitution ratios were found in X8 domain and glycoside hydrolase family 17 (glucan endo-1,3-beta-glucosidase) genes, which has not been reported in Arabidopsis , rice  or maize . Current annotations show that limited low-confidence genes were included in these two Pfam gene families, although we cannot rule out the possibility that these genes are pseudogenes, or truncated because of the transposon elements. Further studies are required to validate whether they are related to specific biological processes in sorghum. However, the function of these genes in carbohydrate binding as well as in cell wall biosynthesis certainly provides clues to manipulating genes of interest for biofuel production.
In sorghum, the 14 gene families enriched with large-effect SNPs comprise genes encoding DUF proteins with unknown functions or include transponsons, which appear to be nonfunctional but may affect genetic variation at the genome scale. Furthermore, gene families involved in biotic and abiotic stress tolerance, which do not contain transposons, also harbor enriched large-effect SNPs. For instance, over-expression of lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase can increase lipid metabolism and the fluidity of membranes and hence the resistance to heat and/or cold shock (United States Patent Application 20050150007), whereas chalcone synthase in flavonoid biosynthesis and stilbene synthases for phytoalexin biosynthesis play important roles in sorghum disease resistance [56, 57]. None of these gene families were reported to be enriched with large-effect SNPs in Arabidopsis, rice or maize. This could be due to genome/species-specific diversity, or result from the prediction algorithms used. Alternatively, this may also be related to the limited sorghum lines used, which have diverse relationships.
This effort also uncovered substantial numbers of indels and PAVs in the sorghum genomes. Indels that are not multiples of 3 bp were particularly uncommon in coding regions but relatively common in non-coding regions. This implies that most frameshift mutations are harmful to sorghum survival. The spectrum of gene families affected by indels and PAVs was similar to that of large-effect SNPs. This implies that although the origins and scales of affected genome segments may differ, SNPs, indels and PAVs may share similar survival and distribution patterns, at least in terms of gene families affected. CNV studies in plants lag behind those in animal and human models. Recent studies in maize showed its potential contribution to the heterosis of this crop during domestication and disease responses [22, 30, 31]. CNVs also shaped the genome diversity of progeny of the immediate next generations in Arabidopsis . In the sorghum genomes, CNVs were present in several thousand genes, and some of the commonly involved genes are involved in basic biological functions as well as sugar- and bioenergy-associated traits. How this variation is associated with phenotypic variation is a new direction of future research.
The resequenced sorghum lines contained two elite sweet sorghum lines and one local elite Chinese grain sorghum line. We were able to identify genetic variation in 1,442 genes differentiating sweet and grain sorghum. Some of these genes are involved in the starch and sucrose metabolism pathway and the lignin- and coumarine-biosynthesis-associated phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway, which are obvious candidates for sugar and biofuel production and deserve further study. Five genes in the starch and sucrose metabolism pathway were identified and are located on chromosomes 2, 6 and 9. In the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway the cinnamyl-alcohol dehydrogenase gene (Sb06g028240, encoding EC 220.127.116.11) on chromosome 6 plays a central role in lignin biosynthesis. Previous genetic analyses have identified several quantitative trait loci controlling stem Brix content, grain yields, plant height and biomass on the same chromosomes [35, 36, 41, 58]. However, due to the lack of the links between the genome physical map and the genetic linkage maps, it is hard to judge whether these genes and quantitative trait loci co-localize and further genetics and functional genomics studies are required to characterize the functions of these genes. Some of these gene families and pathways, may not be directly associated with sugar and biofuel traits, but rather reflect variation inherited from their different origins and/or caused by breeding selection. It is known that sweet sorghums are of polyphyletic origin, spreading from the kafir, caudatum, bicolor and other grain sorghum types [37, 41]. Furthermore, using the BTx623 genome as a reference, the Chinese kaoliang line Ji2731 was found to harbor a lot more genetic variation than the other two lines (Additional file 6). Further genome-wide analysis with a panel of sweet and grain sorghum lines, close relatives of sorghum, as well as Chinese kaoliang is required to illustrate the complex relationships.
We report here a whole genome map of SNPs, indels, PAVs and CNVs amongst elite sorghum lines, which can be used as a framework for future comparative and functional genomics. Sorghum is an important global crop, used for food, fodder, the production of alcoholic beverages, as well as biofuels. Genome-wide comparison studies with trait data of elite sorghum lines using the SNPs, indels, PAVs and CNVs discovered here will provide additional clues to the molecular basis of the remarkable traits of sweet sorghum and will provide a powerful source for association genetics and discovery of alleles, which can be combined to achieve crop improvement in the future.
Materials and methods
Plant materials and sequence data sets
Four sorghum (S. bicolor) accessions were used in this study. Btx623 is an elite grain sorghum line used for whole-genome sequencing by the Joint Genome Institute and for making several mapping populations . Keller (GRIN access code PI 653617) is an elite sweet sorghum line developed by DM Broadhead at US Sugar Crops Field Station at Meridan, Mississippi in 1982 and has been grown globally and proven to have good performance across a range of environmental conditions . E-Tian (literally meaning Russian Sweet in Chinese) was a line introduced to China in the early 1970s and is known to have high stem Brix content, while Ji2731 is a Chinese local grain sorghum well adapted to the northeastern part of China with good seedling establishment and a short growth period (Professor Shi-Jie Gao and Dr Wei-Bin Gu, personal communication; Archives of Crop Varieties in Jilin Province, 1988).
Seeds were imbibed and germinated at 25°C in darkness under standard glasshouse conditions for 4 days and 10-day-old etiolated seedlings were harvested for DNA isolation using the CTAB (Hexadecyl trimethyl-ammonium bromide) buffer method. Following quality assessment, genomic DNA was randomly fragmented using sonification and size-fractionated through electrophoresis and DNA fragments of the desired length were gel purified. Adapter ligation and DNA cluster preparation were performed and subjected to Solexa sequencing according to the supplier's protocol. The BTx623 reference genome sequences were downloaded from the Joint Genome Institute Phytozome website .
We used a three-step procedure to detect high-quality SNPs. First, we calculated the likelihood of each accession's genotype using SOAPsnp . Based on the alignment results, with consideration and analysis of data characteristics, sequencing quality and other experimental influences, the Bayesian model was applied to the actual data to calculate the probability of genotypes. The genotype with the highest probability was selected as the genotype of the sequencing individual at the specific locus and a quality value was designated accordingly to reveal the accuracy of the genotype. Second, using the consensus sequence, a polymorphic locus against the reference sequence was selected. Third, on the basis of the resequencing data of three accessions, sites with sufficient quality, called effective sites, were used for SNP determination. Sufficient quality was based on the following criteria: 3 ≤ depth ≤ 50, with depth calculated using data from each individual, and average mappable sites < 1.5. Candidate SNPs were those with sequencing depth of 3 to 50 for each accession and an average quality for the novel allele > 20. To exclude SNP calling errors caused by incorrect mapping or indels, we did not call two adjacent SNPs that were separated by < 5 bp. The remaining SNPs were defined as high quality SNPs. We performed SNP calling for each of the three accessions. These SNPs were used to calculate the whole genome SNP number and for further analysis. In SOAPsnp, a sum rank test was used to check the heterozygous sites of the called consensus. The read depth was used to filter the candidate SNPs and to obtain high accuracy heterozygous SNP sites. For a diploid genome, a site is considered heterozygous if each allele is supported by at least three reads.
The localization of SNPs in coding regions, non-coding regions, start codons, stop codons and splice sites was based on annotation of gene models as provided by the Sorghum bicolor Genome Database . Gene family annotation data of genes were also retrieved from this database.
Short indel detection
For short indel identification, mapped reads that met the pair-end requirements and contain alignment gaps in one end were necessary. We first mapped the paired-end reads to the reference sequence by allowing up to 10-bp gaps, and then merged these redundant pairs prior to looking for indels. Subsequently, gaps that were supported by at least three non-redundant paired-end reads were extracted. A potential indel was identified when the number of the un-gapped reads that crossed a potential indel was no more than twice that of the gapped reads. For quality control, the final list of indels included only those identified on both strands by paired-end reads.
Presence/absence variation detection
According to the principal of paired-end sequencing, one of the paired-end reads should normally be aligned onto the forward sequence, while the other should be aligned onto the reverse sequence. The distance between the two aligned positions at the reference should be in accordance with the insert size. Thus, two paired-end reads aligned to the genome should have a normal orientation and appropriate span. If the orientation or span of the two paired-end reads is different from expectation for the alignments results, the region might then have structure variation. The abnormal paired-end alignments are analyzed by clustering and compared with the types of structure variation previously defined. In this manner, PAVs could be detected, with support from at least three abnormal paired-end reads. In this study, PAVs that were supported by at least six paired-end reads were thought to be of high quality and selected as the final PAVs.
Copy number variation detection
We detected CNVs by the following steps: (i) DNA sequences were separated into fragments according to the depth of each base from the alignment results; (ii) we calculated the P-value for each fragment to estimate its probability to be a CNV; and (iii) fragments that passed the criteria (fragment length longer than 2 kb, P-value ≤0.35, mean depth less than 0.5 or more than 2.0) were kept as CNVs. The P-value was calculated as the probability of each observed depth (d) under the distribution of a simulated Poisson distributed data set whose expected value (E(d)) equals the observed mean depth. If d < E(d), the P-value = P(x ≤ d) × 2, else P-value = P(x ≥ d) × 2. The credibility of a CNV increases as the P-value becomes smaller.
Sweet-associated genes and pathway enrichment analysis
Using the BTx623 gene set as the reference, genes with non-synonymous SNPs identified in the Keller and E-Tian lines were selected as the candidate gene set. These genes were then analyzed to remove those that also contain non-synonymous SNPs in Ji2731 and the remaining genes were considered the sweet-associated genes. Sweet-associated genes were mapped to KEGG  sorghum pathway data and were examined for whether they are enriched in particular pathways based on the hypergeometric distribution test. Fisher's exact test was used to identify pathways significantly enriched (P-value < 0.1) with sweet-associated genes.
Two levels of data validation experiments were performed. For Sanger sequencing, primer sequences spanning genomic regions predicted to contain genetic variation were used to amplify genomic DNA templates from the three sorghum lines. For PCR reactions, each 10 μl reaction contained 50 ng of template DNA, 1.5 mM Mg2+, 1.5 mM dNTPs, 1.5 μM of each primer, 1 μl of 10 × PCR buffer, and 1.25 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega, China Branch, Beijing). The PCR conditions were 5 minutes at 95°C, followed by 30 cycles of 95°C/45 s, 58°C/45 s, and 72°C/90 s, ending with an extension of 72°C/5 minutes. The PCR products were subsequently analyzed using an ABI 3730 DNA analyzer.
The raw sequence data in the fastq format from this study were deposited in the NCBI Short Read Archive  under the accession number SRA046843. The annotated assemblies of S. bicolor genetic variations, including SNPs, indels, structural variations, and CNVs, as well as novel sequence contigs, are freely available from GigaScience . The data have also been deposited in DDBJ/EMBL/ GenBank under the accession numbers AHAO00000000 (E-Tian cultivar); AHAP00000000 (Ji2731 cultivar); AHAQ00000000 (Keller cultivar). The versions described in this article are the first versions AHAO01000000, AHAP01000000 and AHAQ01000000.
copy number variation
expressed sequence tag
insertion and deletion
Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
single nucleotide polymorphism
We thank Professors Dongyun Hao and Shi-Jie Gao and Dr Wei-Bin Gu for the seeds and information of the sorghum lines used for resequencing. We also thank other members of Hai-Chun Jing's lab and the bioinformatics team at BGI-Shenzhen for assistance in analyzing and experimentally verifying the data. Drs Kang Chong, Keping Ma, Sanwen Huang and Jun Wang are acknowledged for stimulating discussions during the initiation phase of this study. This work was funded by the grant of the Knowledge Innovation Programme (KIP) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences to Hai-Chun Jing (KSCX2-YW-G-067).
- Rooney WL, Blumenthal J, Bean B, Mullet JE: Designing sorghum as a dedicated bioenergy feedstock. Biofuels Bioproducts Biorefining-Biofpr. 2007, 1: 147-157. 10.1002/bbb.15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carpita NC, McCann MC: Maize and sorghum: genetic resources for bioenergy grasses. Trends Plant Sci. 2008, 13: 415-420. 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.06.002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vermerris W: Survey of genomics approaches to improve bioenergy traits in maize, sorghum and sugarcane. J Integr Plant Biol. 2011, 53: 105-119. 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010.01020.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ashley-Koch A, Yang Q, Olney RS: Sickle hemoglobin (HbS) allele and sickle cell disease: a HuGE review. Am J Epidemiol. 2000, 151: 839-845.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kerem B, Rommens JM, Buchanan JA, Markiewicz D, Cox TK, Chakravarti A, Buchwald M, Tsui LC: Identification of the cystic fibrosis gene: genetic analysis. Science. 1989, 245: 1073-1080. 10.1126/science.2570460.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Riordan JR, Rommens JM, Kerem B, Alon N, Rozmahel R, Grzelczak Z, Zielenski J, Lok S, Plavsic N, Chou JL, et al: Identification of the cystic fibrosis gene: cloning and characterization of complementary DNA. Science. 1989, 245: 1066-1073. 10.1126/science.2475911.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rommens JM, Iannuzzi MC, Kerem B, Drumm ML, Melmer G, Dean M, Rozmahel R, Cole JL, Kennedy D, Hidaka N, et al: Identification of the cystic fibrosis gene: chromosome walking and jumping. Science. 1989, 245: 1059-1065. 10.1126/science.2772657.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Muller HJ: Bar Duplication. Science. 1936, 83: 528-530.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bridges CB: The bar "gene" a duplication. Science. 1936, 83: 210-211. 10.1126/science.83.2148.210.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Collard BC, Mackill DJ: Marker-assisted selection: an approach for precision plant breeding in the twenty-first century. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008, 363: 557-572. 10.1098/rstb.2007.2170.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ganal MW, Altmann T, Roder MS: SNP identification in crop plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2009, 12: 211-217. 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.12.009.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Langridge P, Fleury D: Making the most of 'omics' for crop breeding. Trends Biotechnol. 2011, 29: 33-40. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.09.006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schmid KJ, Sorensen TR, Stracke R, Torjek O, Altmann T, Mitchell-Olds T, Weisshaar B: Large-scale identification and analysis of genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphisms for mapping in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Res. 2003, 13: 1250-1257. 10.1101/gr.728603.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Feltus FA, Wan J, Schulze SR, Estill JC, Jiang N, Paterson AH: An SNP resource for rice genetics and breeding based on subspecies Indica and Japonica genome alignments. Genome Res. 2004, 14: 1812-1819. 10.1101/gr.2479404.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ossowski S, Schneeberger K, Clark RM, Lanz C, Warthmann N, Weigel D: Sequencing of natural strains of Arabidopsis thaliana with short reads. Genome Res. 2008, 18: 2024-2033. 10.1101/gr.080200.108.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gore MA, Chia JM, Elshire RJ, Sun Q, Ersoz ES, Hurwitz BL, Peiffer JA, McMullen MD, Grills GS, Ross-Ibarra J, Ware DH, Buckler ES: A first-generation haplotype map of maize. Science. 2009, 326: 1115-1117. 10.1126/science.1177837.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huang X, Wei X, Sang T, Zhao Q, Feng Q, Zhao Y, Li C, Zhu C, Lu T, Zhang Z, Li M, Fan D, Guo Y, Wang A, Wang L, Deng L, Li W, Lu Y, Weng Q, Liu K, Huang T, Zhou T, Jing Y, Li W, Lin Z, Buckler ES, Qian Q, Zhang QF, Li J, Han B: Genome-wide association studies of 14 agronomic traits in rice landraces. Nat Genet. 2010, 42: 961-967. 10.1038/ng.695.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kump KL, Bradbury PJ, Wisser RJ, Buckler ES, Belcher AR, Oropeza-Rosas MA, Zwonitzer JC, Kresovich S, McMullen MD, Ware D, Balint-Kurti PJ, Holland JB: Genome-wide association study of quantitative resistance to southern leaf blight in the maize nested association mapping population. Nat Genet. 2011, 43: 163-168. 10.1038/ng.747.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Clark RM, Schweikert G, Toomajian C, Ossowski S, Zeller G, Shinn P, Warthmann N, Hu TT, Fu G, Hinds DA, Chen H, Frazer KA, Huson DH, Schölkopf B, Nordborg M, Rätsch G, Ecker JR, Weigel D: Common sequence polymorphisms shaping genetic diversity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science. 2007, 317: 338-342. 10.1126/science.1138632.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McNally KL, Childs KL, Bohnert R, Davidson RM, Zhao K, Ulat VJ, Zeller G, Clark RM, Hoen DR, Bureau TE, Stokowski R, Ballinger DG, Frazer KA, Cox DR, Padhukasahasram B, Bustamante CD, Weigel D, Mackill DJ, Bruskiewich RM, Rätsch G, Buell CR, Leung H, Leach JE: Genomewide SNP variation reveals relationships among landraces and modern varieties of rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009, 106: 12273-12278. 10.1073/pnas.0900992106.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang L, Hao L, Li X, Hu S, Ge S, Yu J: SNP deserts of Asian cultivated rice: genomic regions under domestication. J Evol Biol. 2009, 22: 751-761. 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01698.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lai J, Li R, Xu X, Jin W, Xu M, Zhao H, Xiang Z, Song W, Ying K, Zhang M, Jiao Y, Ni P, Zhang J, Li D, Guo X, Ye K, Jian M, Wang B, Zheng H, Liang H, Zhang X, Wang S, Chen S, Li J, Fu Y, Springer NM, Yang H, Wang J, Dai J, Schnable PS, Wang J: Genome-wide patterns of genetic variation among elite maize inbred lines. Nat Genet. 2010, 42: 1027-1030. 10.1038/ng.684.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van Heerwaarden J, Doebley J, Briggs WH, Glaubitz JC, Goodman MM, de Jesus Sanchez Gonzalez J, Ross-Ibarra J: Genetic signals of origin, spread, and introgression in a large sample of maize landraces. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011, 108: 1088-1092. 10.1073/pnas.1013011108.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Borevitz JO, Liang D, Plouffe D, Chang HS, Zhu T, Weigel D, Berry CC, Winzeler E, Chory J: Large-scale identification of single-feature polymorphisms in complex genomes. Genome Res. 2003, 13: 513-523. 10.1101/gr.541303.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kumar R, Qiu J, Joshi T, Valliyodan B, Xu D, Nguyen HT: Single feature polymorphism discovery in rice. PLoS One. 2007, 2: e284-10.1371/journal.pone.0000284.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bruce M, Hess A, Bai J, Mauleon R, Diaz MG, Sugiyama N, Bordeos A, Wang GL, Leung H, Leach JE: Detection of genomic deletions in rice using oligonucleotide microarrays. BMC Genomics. 2009, 10: 129-10.1186/1471-2164-10-129.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Salathia N, Lee HN, Sangster TA, Morneau K, Landry CR, Schellenberg K, Behere AS, Gunderson KL, Cavalieri D, Jander G, Queitsch C: Indel arrays: an affordable alternative for genotyping. Plant J. 2007, 51: 727-737. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03194.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fu H, Dooner HK: Intraspecific violation of genetic colinearity and its implications in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 9573-9578.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brunner S, Fengler K, Morgante M, Tingey S, Rafalski A: Evolution of DNA sequence nonhomologies among maize inbreds. Plant Cell. 2005, 17: 343-360. 10.1105/tpc.104.025627.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Springer NM, Ying K, Fu Y, Ji T, Yeh CT, Jia Y, Wu W, Richmond T, Kitzman J, Rosenbaum H, Iniguez AL, Barbazuk WB, Jeddeloh JA, Nettleton D, Schnable PS: Maize inbreds exhibit high levels of copy number variation (CNV) and presence/absence variation (PAV) in genome content. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5: e1000734-10.1371/journal.pgen.1000734.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Belo A, Beatty MK, Hondred D, Fengler KA, Li B, Rafalski A: Allelic genome structural variations in maize detected by array comparative genome hybridization. Theor Appl Genet. 2009, 120: 355-367.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- DeBolt S: Copy number variation shapes genome diversity in Arabidopsis over immediate family generational scales. Genome Biol Evol. 2010, 2: 441-453. 10.1093/gbe/evq033.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Harlan JR, deWet JWJ: A simplified classification of sorghum. Crop Sci. 1972, 12: 172-176. 10.2135/cropsci1972.0011183X001200020005x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vietor DM, Miller FR: Assimilation, partitioning, and nonstructural carbohydrate in sweet compared with grain sorghum. Crop Sci. 1990, 30: 1109-1115. 10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000050030x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Murray SC, Sharma A, Rooney WL, Klein PE, Mullet JE, Mitchell SE, Kresovich S: Genetic improvement of sorghum as a biofuel feedstock: I. QTL for stem sugar and grain nonstructural carbohydrates. Crop Sci. 2008, 48: 2165-2179. 10.2135/cropsci2008.01.0016.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Murray SC, Rooney WL, Mitchell SE, Sharma A, Klein PE, Mullet JE, Kresovich S: Genetic improvement of sorghum as a biofuel feedstock: II. QTL for stem and leaf structural carbohydrates. Crop Sci. 2008, 48: 2180-2193. 10.2135/cropsci2008.01.0068.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ritter KB, McIntyre CL, Godwin ID, Jordan DR, Chapman SC: An assessment of the genetic relationship between sweet and grain sorghums, within Sorghum bicolor ssp bicolor (L.) Moench, using AFLP markers. Euphytica. 2007, 157: 161-176. 10.1007/s10681-007-9408-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Paterson AH: Genomics of sorghum. Int J Plant Genomics. 2008, 2008: 362451-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Draye X, Lin YR, Qian XY, Bowers JE, Burow GB, Morrell PL, Peterson DG, Presting GG, Ren SX, Wing RA, Paterson AH: Toward integration of comparative genetic, physical, diversity, and cytomolecular maps for grasses and grains, using the sorghum genome as a foundation. Plant Physiol. 2001, 125: 1325-1341. 10.1104/pp.125.3.1325.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Paterson AH, Bowers JE, Bruggmann R, Dubchak I, Grimwood J, Gundlach H, Haberer G, Hellsten U, Mitros T, Poliakov A, Schmutz J, Spannagl M, Tang H, Wang X, Wicker T, Bharti AK, Chapman J, Feltus FA, Gowik U, Grigoriev IV, Lyons E, Maher CA, Martis M, Narechania A, Otillar RP, Penning BW, Salamov AA, Wang Y, Zhang L, Carpita NC, et al: The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature. 2009, 457: 551-556. 10.1038/nature07723.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang ML, Zhu C, Barkley NA, Chen Z, Erpelding JE, Murray SC, Tuinstra MR, Tesso T, Pederson GA, Yu J: Genetic diversity and population structure analysis of accessions in the US historic sweet sorghum collection. Theor Appl Genet. 2009, 120: 13-23. 10.1007/s00122-009-1155-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- SOAP. [http://soap.genomics.org.cn]
- Li R, Li Y, Fang X, Yang H, Wang J, Kristiansen K: SNP detection for massively parallel whole-genome resequencing. Genome Res. 2009, 19: 1124-1132. 10.1101/gr.088013.108.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yoon S, Xuan Z, Makarov V, Ye K, Sebat J: Sensitive and accurate detection of copy number variants using read depth of coverage. Genome Res. 2009, 19: 1586-1592. 10.1101/gr.092981.109.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Phytozome Sorghum bicolor (Cereal grass). [http://www.phytozome.net/sorghum]
- MaizeGDB. [http://www.maizegdb.org]
- Rudrabhatla P, Reddy MM, Rajasekharan R: Genome-wide analysis and experimentation of plant serine/threonine/tyrosine-specific protein kinases. Plant Mol Biol. 2006, 60: 293-319. 10.1007/s11103-005-4109-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thomas JH: Adaptive evolution in two large families of ubiquitin-ligase adapters in nematodes and plants. Genome Res. 2006, 16: 1017-1030. 10.1101/gr.5089806.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hardie DG: Plant protein serine/threonine kinases: classification and functions. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1999, 50: 97-131. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.97.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Frazer KA, Eskin E, Kang HM, Bogue MA, Hinds DA, Beilharz EJ, Gupta RV, Montgomery J, Morenzoni MM, Nilsen GB, Pethiyagoda CL, Stuve LL, Johnson FM, Daly MJ, Wade CM, Cox DR: A sequence-based variation map of 8.27 million SNPs in inbred mouse strains. Nature. 2007, 448: 1050-1053. 10.1038/nature06067.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim S, Plagnol V, Hu TT, Toomajian C, Clark RM, Ossowski S, Ecker JR, Weigel D, Nordborg M: Recombination and linkage disequilibrium in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Genet. 2007, 39: 1151-1155. 10.1038/ng2115.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hinds DA, Stuve LL, Nilsen GB, Halperin E, Eskin E, Ballinger DG, Frazer KA, Cox DR: Whole-genome patterns of common DNA variation in three human populations. Science. 2005, 307: 1072-1079. 10.1126/science.1105436.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schnable PS, Ware D, Fulton RS, Stein JC, Wei F, Pasternak S, Liang C, Zhang J, Fulton L, Graves TA, Minx P, Reily AD, Courtney L, Kruchowski SS, Tomlinson C, Strong C, Delehaunty K, Fronick C, Courtney B, Rock SM, Belter E, Du F, Kim K, Abbott RM, Cotton M, Levy A, Marchetto P, Ochoa K, Jackson SM, Gillam B, et al: The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science. 2009, 326: 1112-1115. 10.1126/science.1178534.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stahl EA, Dwyer G, Mauricio R, Kreitman M, Bergelson J: Dynamics of disease resistance polymorphism at the Rpm1 locus of Arabidopsis. Nature. 1999, 400: 667-671. 10.1038/23260.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McDowell JM, Dhandaydham M, Long TA, Aarts MG, Goff S, Holub EB, Dangl JL: Intragenic recombination and diversifying selection contribute to the evolution of downy mildew resistance at the RPP8 locus of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 1998, 10: 1861-1874.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Winkel-Shirley B: Flavonoid biosynthesis. A colorful model for genetics, biochemistry, cell biology, and biotechnology. Plant Physiol. 2001, 126: 485-493. 10.1104/pp.126.2.485.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yu CK, Springob K, Schmidt J, Nicholson RL, Chu IK, Yip WK, Lo C: A stilbene synthase gene (SbSTS1) is involved in host and nonhost defense responses in sorghum. Plant Physiol. 2005, 138: 393-401. 10.1104/pp.105.059337.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shiringani AL, Frisch M, Friedt W: Genetic mapping of QTLs for sugar-related traits in a RIL population of Sorghum bicolor L. Moench. Theor Appl Genet. 2010, 121: 323-336. 10.1007/s00122-010-1312-y.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sorghum bicolor genome. [http://www.plantgdb.org/SbGDB/]
- KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. [http://www.genome.jp/kegg/]
- Sequence Read Archive. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra]
- Zheng LY, Guo XS, He B, Sun LJ, Peng Y, Dong SS, Liu TF, Jiang S, Ramachandran S, Liu CM, Jing H-C: Genome data from sweet and grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolour). GigaScience. 2011, [http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/100012]Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.