Skip to main content

Table 1 Evolution of gene regulation by duplication or by convergent evolution

From: Horizontal gene transfer and the evolution of transcriptional regulation in Escherichia coli

Type of shared regulation

Interactions (n)

Percentage

All three types of shared regulation, combined

425

14.2%

   Evolved by duplication

145

4.8%

   Unclear

94

3.1%

   Convergent evolution

186

6.2%

Interactions that are not shared with paralogs

2,570

85.8%

All of RegulonDB (with autoregulation removed)

2,995

100.0%

Type 1: paralogous TFs regulate the same genes

212

7.1%

   Evolved by duplication

84

2.8%

   Unclear

64

2.1%

Relative ages are unclear, and TFs bind the same site

62

2.1%

Duplication of TFs is recent, but TFs bind different sites

2

0.1%

   Convergent evolution

64

2.1%

   Duplication of TFs is old, and TFs bind different sites

26

0.9%

   Duplication of TFs is old, but TFs bind the same site

28

0.9%

   Duplication of TFs is old, and sites are not known

10

0.3%

Type 2: paralogous genes are regulated by the same TF

290

9.7%

   Evolved by duplication

76

2.5%

   Unclear

26

0.9%

   Convergent evolution

188

6.3%

Differences in operon structure

166

5.5%

Operons are consistent, but acquired after duplication

22

0.7%

Type 3: paralogous TFs regulate paralogous genes

54

1.8%

   Evolved by duplication (similar ages)

8

0.3%

   Convergent evolution

46

1.5%

Complex HGT of regulated genes after TF duplication

16

0.5%

TF duplication precedes that of regulated genes

30

1.0%

  1. For each case of shared regulation between paralogs, we examined the evolutionary histories of the duplicated genes to determine whether the regulation was likely to be conserved from the common ancestor. If so, then the regulatory similarity probably evolved by duplication; if not, then the similarity results from convergent evolution. For cases where two paralogous transcription factors (TFs) regulate the same operon, we also considered whether the TFs bind to the same site. For cases where two paralogous genes are regulated by the same TF, we also considered whether the first genes in the operons were homologous, as would be expected for evolution by duplication. The results are tabulated here (see Additional data file 5 for individual interactions). Because some regulatory interactions are shared with paralogs in more than one way, the totals are smaller than the sums over the types.