Open Access

RASTA-Bacteria: a web-based tool for identifying toxin-antitoxin loci in prokaryotes

Genome Biology20078:R155

DOI: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-8-r155

Received: 29 March 2007

Accepted: 1 August 2007

Published: 01 August 2007

Abstract

Toxin/antitoxin (TA) systems, viewed as essential regulators of growth arrest and programmed cell death, are widespread among prokaryotes, but remain sparsely annotated. We present RASTA-Bacteria, an automated method allowing quick and reliable identification of TA loci in sequenced prokaryotic genomes, whether they are annotated open reading frames or not. The tool successfully confirmed all reported TA systems, and spotted new putative loci upon screening of sequenced genomes. RASTA-Bacteria is publicly available at http://genoweb.univ-rennes1.fr/duals/RASTA-Bacteria.

Rationale

More than 500 prokaryotic genomes have now been completely sequenced and annotated, and the number of sequencing projects underway (approximately 1,300) indicates that the amount of such data is going to rise very rapidly [1, 2]. Large-scale comparative genomics based on these data constituted a giant leap forward in the process of gene identification. Nevertheless, substantial numbers of annotated open reading frames (ORFs) throughout the sequenced genomes remain hypothetical, most of which are 200 amino acids in length or shorter [3]. Luckily, interest in these small ORFs (sORFs) is growing [4], and recent work in Sacharromyces cerevisiae shows that they may be involved in key cellular functions [5].

The toxin/antitoxin (TA) modules are a group of sORFs for which knowledge has been improving over the past two decades. Most TA modules are constituted of two adjacent co-oriented but antagonist genes: one encodes a stable toxin harmful to an essential cell process, and the second a labile antitoxin that blocks the toxin's activity by DNA- or protein-binding [6]. TA pairs have been classified into two types. The first are those where the antitoxin is an antisense-RNA. They have been linked to plasmid stabilization by means of a post-segregational killing (PSK) effect, [7] (for a review, see [8]). The second type, on which we focus in this study, includes loci where the antitoxin is a fully translated protein. For consistency with previous studies, we shall refer to them throughout this paper as TA systems.

For some time after their discovery in 1983 [9], TA systems were only found on plasmids. They were defined as plasmid inheritance guarantor systems, and called 'plasmid addiction systems'. Several years later, two homologous TA operons were discovered on the Escherichia coli chromosome [10, 11]. Interest in these chromosomal TA systems led to the discovery of further systems in various bacteria [1214], and of their involvement in programmed cell death (PCD) [15]. It was suggested that under severe starvation conditions, the TA-mediated PCD of moribund subpopulations provides the remaining healthy cells with nutrients, thus benefiting the species. Proof was later established that some TA systems actually provoke a static state in certain adverse conditions, in which cells remain viable but do not proliferate, and that this state is fully reversible on cognate antitoxin induction [16]. However, it was later shown that this reversible effect is only possible within a limited time frame. Subsequently, there is a 'point of no return' in the killing effect of the toxin [17, 18].

TA systems, widespread among both bacteria and archaea [19], are currently classified into eight families, depending on their structural features or modes of action [20]. Little is known about the only three-component family, whose founding member is the omega-epsilon-zeta (ω-ε-ζ) system from plasmid pSM19035, except that the additional gene (ω) acts as a repressor regulating the transcription of the operon [21]. ω-ε-ζ systems are found only in Gram-positive bacteria. The remaining seven, two-component families, include: the ParDE system, found in Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria and in archaea, targets DNA gyrase [22]; HigBA, unique in that its toxin is located upstream from its antitoxin [23], is found in Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, and its action involves mRNA cleavage [24]; the phd/doc locus, found in all types of prokaryotes, is believed to inhibit translation [25]; and the vapBC locus, found both on plasmids and chromosomes, seems to be the TA system with the highest copy-number in the prokaryotes that bear them, but no cellular target has yet been reported, although VapC toxins contain a PIN domain (homologue of the pilT amino-terminal domain: ribonuclease involved in nonsense-mediated mRNA decay and RNA interference in eukaryotes), suggesting that the system may contribute to quality control of gene expression [26]. The other three families are the best characterized: the ccdAB locus, found only in some Gram-negative bacteria, stabilizes plasmids upon replication by targeting DNA gyrase [27]; members of the RelBE family, present in Gram-negatives, Gram-positives and archaea, inhibit cell growth by impairing translation due to mRNA cleavage through the A-site of the ribosome [28, 29]; and finally, the toxins of the MazEF/PemIK family, sometimes referred to as 'RNA interferases' [30], are ribonucleases that cleave cellular mRNA, thus depriving the ribosomes of substrates to translate [31] - they have been found in Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria.

The role of TA systems in programmed cell death opens promising possibilities for the design of a new class of antibiotics [32]. Moreover, chromosome-borne TA systems are activated by various extreme conditions, including the presence of antibiotics [33] or infecting phages [34], thymine starvation or other DNA damage [35], high temperatures, and oxidative stress [36]. Their involvement in the response to amino acid starvation [37] also raises large interest: indeed, TA modules are believed to provide a backup system to the stringent response by controlling superfluous macromolecular biosynthesis during stasis independently of ppGpp [38], the stringent response alarmone eliciting the protective reactions cascade. A reduced rate of translation is associated with fewer translational errors, so TA loci may contribute to quality control of gene expression, helping the cells cope with nutritional stress [20]. Therefore, it remains a priority to exhaustively identify TA loci in prokaryotic organisms in order to improve our understanding of these systems and more broadly of the cellular mechanisms behind bacterial adaptation.

In 2005, Pandey and co-workers [39] performed an exhaustive search in 126 completely sequenced genomes (archaea and eubacteria), using standard sequence alignment tools (BLASTP and TBLASTN). Their work highlighted a surprising diversity in the distribution of TA loci: some organisms have many (Nitrosomonas europaea has 45 potential TA systems), whereas more than half of the other species have between 1 and 5, and 31 have none. Nevertheless, the use of basic nucleic or amino acid sequence similarity limits these findings to toxins and antitoxins for which a clear homolog exists; there is, therefore, a possible bias in their results. In view of the aforementioned lack of annotation of the small ORFs, and to improve localization techniques for TA systems, we developed a simple method for identifying all potential TA systems in a given bacterial genome: Rapid Automated Scan for Toxins and Antitoxins in Bacteria (RASTA-Bacteria). This method is based on the genomic features associated with toxins and antitoxins and the existence of conserved functional domains. The results, sorted by a confidence score, discard no candidate, thus providing the user an extensive overview of the data.

Process overview

The module-based pipeline of RASTA-Bacteria is described in Figure 1. The first step is to provide a genomic sequence. Even though it can be useful to test relatively short 'raw' nucleic sequences for the presence of a TA system, RASTA-Bacteria was designed to function with whole-replicon genomic sequences, regardless of their size (small plasmids or large chromosomes). The tool can thus take both simple (FASTA-formatted) nucleic sequences or fully annotated (GenBank) files as input data. They can either be selected from an extensive list of sequenced bacterial and archaeal genomes, or be provided by the user in the case of an unpublished genome.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fgb-2007-8-8-r155/MediaObjects/13059_2007_Article_1636_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Schematic modular pipeline of RASTA-Bacteria. Step 1: provide a nucleic genome sequence in GenBank or raw Fasta format. Step 2: tune the search parameters (optional). Step 3: launch the search; each module calculates a local score, and possibly modifies the dataset (Sx = score at level x; Ny = number of ORFs in dataset; Lz = length distribution of dataset; b1 = bonus). Step 4: output in webpage and/or results files available for download.

The second step enables the user to tune optional parameters for the search: depending on the origin of the input sequence, it is possible to choose the length-scoring model, from 'general', 'archaea', 'Gram+', and 'Gram-', on which the scoring function must rely. The sensitivity of the tool can also be improved by modifying the bit-score threshold for the RPSBLAST alignments. However, we defined the default value from our experiments and believe it is the most appropriate. Similarly, a minimal ORF size for the ORF finder can be defined, as well as an annotated gene overlap percentage threshold when verifying the annotation. These parameters limit the amount of data (hence time of computation), and should be refined only in particular cases, such as for known high-overlapping genomes for example. The third step is the run phase, performed as follows: first, screening of the nucleic sequence for open-reading frames; second, screening of newly determined ORFs for the presence of TA domains; third, size-based scoring of the ORFs; and fourth, scoring based on the pairing possibility of an ORF with another. In the last step, the results are combined to calculate a global confidence score for each ORF. These are then ranked accordingly and displayed to the user in a tabular format, which ensures clear visualization of the results and allows easy verification by cross-linkage to the data files. For raw nucleic sequences and files below 500 kb, the table is directly viewable in the user's web browser (Figure 2). The results table and supporting files are then available for download as a tar archive. For fully annotated genomes and files over 500 kB, no interactive display will be produced, and the user will be notified by email when the job ends that the archive is ready for download.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fgb-2007-8-8-r155/MediaObjects/13059_2007_Article_1636_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Screenshot of the results displayed as a webpage. This illustration shows the output results ranked by confidence score. The arrows represent internal links to additional supporting data. The amino acid sequence corresponding to an ORF as annotated by RASTA-Bacteria is shown (1). When a conserved TA domain was predicted, the alignment results can be seen in rpsblast output format (2). Anchor links between co-localized candidates allow checking for possible parity (3).

The method developed was automated using Perl, with sequence processing relying on the BioPerl library [40]. The script is embedded in a PHP-based web-interface. RASTA-Bacteria is publicly available from the application website [41].

Description of the algorithm

Genomic features used for discriminating TA systems

It should be noted here that hipBA loci (found to have a role in the production of 'persister cells' in E. coli [42]), as well as restriction-modification (type II) systems, can also be considered as TA systems. Nevertheless, the latter have been extensively identified and characterized elsewhere [43, 44], and have been excluded from our work. Because of its specific organization, the three-component TA family (ω-ε-ζ) was also excluded from the present study.

TA systems by definition consist of, at least, two genes: the 'dormant guard' role is fulfilled by the presence of a toxic and a protective protein together, although some orphan genes (for which conservation of functionality as such remains unclear) have been reported [39, 45]. Whether or not the TA pairs are encoded by genes forming an operon, the spacer seldom extends beyond 30 nucleotides, and a small overlap (1 to 20 nucleotides in general) is the most common structure. The order of the two cooperating genes is also well conserved, with the antitoxin being upstream (Figure 3), although there is an exception: in higBA loci the toxin is upstream of the antitoxin [23].
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fgb-2007-8-8-r155/MediaObjects/13059_2007_Article_1636_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

General genetic context of a TA loci. The typical TA loci organization with sizes and distance profiling is shown.

TA genes in all prokaryotic species are small. According to Pandey et al. [39], antitoxins are 41 to 206 amino acids long and toxins 31 to 204 amino acids long, antitoxins generally being shorter than their partner toxins (Figure 4). Here too there seems to be an exception: the toxin of the HipBA system is 440 amino acids in length (not shown).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fgb-2007-8-8-r155/MediaObjects/13059_2007_Article_1636_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Length distribution of Bacterial toxins and antitoxins. The graph represents the length distribution of antitoxins and toxins in 126 organisms (from [39]), depending on their classification (X-axis, length in amino acids; left Y-axis, number of sequences). The black curves represent the probability over the total population (1,378 TA) for a sequence of length X to constitute a TA (right Y-axis), and were used to determine the length-criterion scoring function as described in the text.

These two features have been used with success as preliminary filters to a biological search for unidentified TA pairs in E. coli [46], but this approach is too permissive to be accurate as an automatic predictor. By adding a third criterion, namely the presence of a conserved functional domain, the selectivity of the method over the input space can be improved. Furthermore, as the knowledge base of TA systems grows, sequence homology can provide further information.

ORF detection and filtering

To bypass the mis-annotation of TA genes, which, like many small ORFs, are easily omitted during the annotation process, the tool begins with a naïve ORF prediction. This first step is essential to ensure that the analysis leaves no possible ORF aside. RASTA-Bacteria thus starts by predicting the entire set of valid ORFs in the sequence, defined as the series of triplets occurring between one of the four accepted prokaryotic start codons (NTG), and one of the three stop codons (TGA, TAG, TAA), with no further assumption about the profile of the ORF. In the case of alternative start codons, redundancy is avoided by considering only the longest possible sequence. Although no possible ORFs should be overlooked, existing genomic information (in the case of an annotated genome, the preferred input) should not be ignored. Indeed, even if sometimes flawed, the original annotation can provide RASTA-Bacteria with valuable hints. Therefore, the tool recovers all the annotated features of the sequence, and compares the 'naïve' ORFs to the existing set of genes. If a naïve ORF overlaps an annotated gene (whose 'product' and 'confidence' fields do not display the terms 'unknown', 'putative', or 'hypothetical') by more than a threshold percentage (see parameters), then it is discarded as a spurious ORF. If the considered ORF corresponds to an annotated ORF, its score is rewarded to reflect the annotators' work, that is, the probability that this ORF actually encodes a protein. For reasons of consistency, this process also renames existing ORFs with their common designation.

Conserved domain verification: a specific TA-dedicated database

Once the whole list of candidate ORFs is established, the ORFs undergo a conserved domain search. To achieve this, we use the Reverse PSI-BLAST program (RPSBLAST, part of the standalone blast archive, release 2.2.14 [47]), which searches a query sequence against a database of pre-computed lookup tables called PSSMs (position specific scoring matrices), originating from the Pfam, Smart, COG, KOG and cd alignment collections (the complete archive of conserved domain PSSMs can be found at [48]). These profiles then need to be formatted as a usable database by the formatrpsdb tool [47]. For our purposes, we thus built a dedicated TA conserved domains database (TAcddb), compiled from the existing profiles of domains known to belong to toxin and antitoxin genes (Table 1), against which all the sequences in amino acids are searched. Consequently, TA systems with unknown functionally conserved domains are unfortunately liable to be penalized. However, the combining of different criteria tempers the risk of overlooking them, and the database is able to evolve as it can be re-compiled with any new set of PSSMs.
Table 1

List of PSSM profiles selected in TAcddb to verify the presence of a conserved TA-related domain

PSSMid

CD accession name

Relation/involvement in TA world

Reference

28977

cd00093-HTH_XRE

XRE-like domain present in HigA and VapB antitoxins

[20], this study

31586

COG1396-HipB

Involved in production of persister cells (antitoxin)

[20]

31676

COG1487-VapC

Quality control of gene expression

[57]

31786

COG1598

HicB of HicAB system (function undetermined)

[58]

31910

COG1724

HicA of HicAB system (function undetermined)

[58]

32033

COG1848

PIN domain, present in VapC toxins

[20,59,60]

32185

COG2002-AbrB

Domain present in of MazE and VapB antitoxins

[20]

32209

COG2026-RelE

Toxin of cytotoxic translational repressor system

[14,28,29]

32344

COG2161-StbD

Antitoxin of the RelBE family

[61]

32487

COG2336-MazE

Growth regulator (antitoxin)

[45]

32488

COG2337-MazF

Growth inhibitor (toxin)

[45]

32907

COG3093-VapI

Named from VapI region; corresponds to VapB antitoxins (Plasmid maintenance)

[62], this study

33351

COG3549-HigB

Toxin of plasmid maintenance system

[23]

33352

COG3550-HipA

Involved in production of persister cells (toxin)

[20]

33408

COG3609

CopG/Arc/MetJ DNA-binding domain, present in RelB, ParD, VapBCand CcdA antitoxins

[20], this study

33452

COG3654-Doc

Toxin of probable translational inhibitor system

[25,63]

33466

COG3668-ParE

Toxin of plasmid stabilization system

[22,64]

33870

COG4113

PIN domain, present in VapC toxins

[20,59,60]

33875

COG4118-Phd

Antitoxin to translational inhibitor Doc

[65]

33951

COG4226-HicB

HicB of HicAB system (predicted)

[58]

34119

COG4423

Predicted antitoxin of PIN domain toxins (VapC)

[57,60]

34135

COG4456-VagC

Antitoxin of plasmid maintenance system

[66]

34307

COG4691-StbC

Plasmid stability proteins (HigBA family)

[67,68], this study

34891

COG5302-CcdA

Antitoxin of plasmid stabilization system

[27,69]

35058

COG5499

Predicted transcription regulators with HTH domain

[20], this study

41431

pfam01381-Hth_3

Present in antitoxins of HigBA and VapBC families

[20], this study

41452

pfam01402-Hth_4

Present in CopG repressors (RelBE, ParDE, VapBC, and CcdAB families)

[20], this study

41869

pfam01845-CcdB

Toxin of plasmid stabilization system

[69]

41874

pfam01850-PIN

DNA binding PIN domain, present in VapC toxins

[59,60]

42429

pfam02452-PemK

Toxin of the MazEF family

[70]

43931

pfam04014-AbrB

Domain present in MazE and VapB antitoxins

[20], this study

44135

pfam04221-RelB

Antitoxin to translational repressor RelE

[14]

44915

pfam05012-Doc

Toxin of probable translational inhibitor system

[63]

44918

pfam05015-Plasmid_killer

Toxins of the HigBA family

[23], this study

44919

pfam05016-Plasmid_stabil

Toxins of the RelE family

[14], this study

45431

pfam05534-HicB

Member of the HicAB system

[58]

47246

pfam07362-CcdA

Antitoxin of plasmid stabilization system

[27,69]

47831

smart00530-Xre

XRE-like HTH domain present in HigA and VapB

[20], this study

References to 'this study' correspond to domains found in this study upon sequence analysis of described TA candidates. AbrB, AidB regulator; HTH, helix-turn-helix; PIN, homologues of the pilin biogenesis protein pilT amino-terminal domain; XRE, xenobiotic response element.

For each candidate, the hits are analyzed to select the most likely in terms of both homology and sequence alignment length. If the candidate ORF exhibits a clear homology, namely a high score and over 80% of a full product domain aligned, but is longer than the corresponding profile, it is scanned for alternative start codons to identify any other 5' end that gives a better profile fit. If this is the case, the ORF is resized to its new coordinates. A short description of the possible domain is stored for subsequent display as a hint to the user for further classification, with an internal hyperlink to the alignment: again, no information is discarded and all the results can be visually assessed. Here, each reference domain used is levelheaded with a coefficient representing its implication in the TA kingdom: those defined by a confirmed TA family have a higher coefficient than domains found in TAs but not exclusive to them (for example, PIN versus VapB domain). This coefficient is computed together with the alignment data to yield the 'domain score'.

The length criterion

The candidates proceed to a size-scoring module. Based on the lengths of 1,378 TA sequences (Figure 4) described following the extensive search by Pandey's team [39], we calculated the probability for length l of a candidate to be that of a toxin or an antitoxin as follows:
P ( L = l ) = n l N MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2Caerbhv2BYDwAHbqedmvETj2BSbqee0evGueE0jxyaibaiKI8=vI8tuQ8FMI8Gi=hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciGacaGaaeqabaqadeqadaaakeaacaWGqbGaaiikaiaadYeacqGH9aqpcaWGSbGaaiykaiabg2da9maalaaabaGaamOBamaaBaaaleaacaWGSbaabeaaaOqaaiaad6eaaaaaaa@3C26@
where N = 1,378. We then defined our scoring function by averaging the probability over k neighboring lengths before and after the considered length such that:
f ( l ) = 1 2 k + 1 i = k k P ( L = l + i ) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2Caerbhv2BYDwAHbqedmvETj2BSbqee0evGueE0jxyaibaiKI8=vI8tuQ8FMI8Gi=hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciGacaGaaeqabaqadeqadaaakeaacaWGMbGaaiikaiaadYgacaGGPaGaeyypa0ZaaSaaaeaacaaIXaaabaGaaGOmaiaadUgacqGHRaWkcaaIXaaaamaaqahabaGaamiuaiaacIcacaWGmbGaeyypa0JaamiBaiabgUcaRiaadMgacaGGPaaaleaacaWGPbGaeyypa0JaeyOeI0Iaam4AaaqaaiaadUgaa0GaeyyeIuoaaaa@4945@

This smoothes the curb of probabilities to some extent, as it avoids accidental high or low counts of a given length to be given undue weight with respect to surrounding lengths. Several datasets were created so that the scoring function reflects the different types of organisms: general, archaea, Gram-negative and Gram-positive. The user can thus choose which model to use depending on the species being considered. Similarly, although defining size functions for each of the seven TA families is at first sight appealing, it should be emphasized that automatic classification of TA loci is risky. This is due to diverging homologies: some toxin motifs pair with antitoxin motifs, or more simply toxins/antitoxins of a given family sometimes demonstrate similarity with those of another family [39]. Therefore, relying on such specific characteristics for the size criterion evaluation might lead to mis-scoring.

ORF 'pair organization' scoring criterion

Finally, the method verifies that the ORFs are paired on the strand considered. To do so, the module searches for close neighbors upstream and downstream of the ORF, in agreement with the distance parameter described above: a neighbor is considered close if it lies less than 30 base-pairs away from the extremities of the ORF, and if it overlaps the ORF by less than 20 base-pairs. In practice, both values can be somewhat enlarged, so as to avoid potential loss of candidates in the case of an extended span of the ORF due to alternative start codons. Thus, if an ORF fits these criteria, its score is rewarded. Furthermore, if the neighbor exhibits a TA length and/or a TA domain, the score is given the corresponding bonus. Obviously, this diminishes the chances of fortuitous or clearly non-TA characterized operons finding themselves among the top candidates.

RASTA-Bacteria in action

All tests reported in this section were carried out with annotated .gbk files downloaded on 1 September 2006 from the RefSeq repository [49], on a Mac PowerPC G5 with Mac OS X v.10.3.9. For multi-replicon organisms, all episomes were included in the analysis. Running times were between 40 s (for a 600 Mb genome) and 33 minutes (for a 9 Gb genome).

Application to the alpha-proteobacteria model: Sinorhizobium meliloti

S. meliloti is a Gram-negative alpha-proteobacterium studied in our laboratory that is found both free-living in soil and in a symbiotic interaction with alfalfa where it forms root nodules. Its genome is made up of a 3.65 Mb circular chromosome and two essential megaplasmids, pSymA (1.35 Mb) and pSymB (1.68 Mb), all of them being GC rich (62.2% global) [50]. These features (large and tripartite genome with recently acquired plasmid, free and symbiotic life ability) make S. meliloti an interesting model for the validation of RASTA-bacteria. In the 2005 search by Pandey et al. [39], 12 TA systems (2 relBE-like, 3 higBA-like, and 7 vapBC-like) were identified, but only the chromosome was considered. We analyzed all three replicons with RASTA-Bacteria, as they are all constituents of the complete genome. Of the 12 systems identified by Pandey et al., 11 were positively discriminated by RASTA, including the ntrPR operon, which was recently shown to function as a TA system [51], demonstrating the good accuracy of our software. The 12th one (higBA-2, GI15965582-15965583) was only poorly rewarded by the method described here; indeed, none of the TA domain profiles corresponding to its described classification (nor others) were matched by the members of this TA pair, which furthermore do not fit the size and distance criteria. Further sequence analysis did reveal similarity with a putative addiction module killer protein for the amino-terminal half of gene 15965582, but a second conserved domain in its carboxy-terminal half, as well as the conserved domains ('ABC transporter') found in its reported partner, are rather contradictory with the fact that this pair might comprise a valid TA system. There is thus no concrete evidence that enables us to confirm this hypothesis.

We found 14 additional putative TA loci on the chromosome (bringing the population to 25 for this replicon), 17 loci on pSymA and 11 on pSymB (Figure 5a). Hence, our approach predicts a total of 53 TA loci in the complete genome of S. meliloti, including 95 genes of which 18 are newly identified. Their distribution across the various replicons seems random, although there is an apparent alternation of rich and poor areas, in particular in the megaplasmids (Figure 6). Similarly, they are remarkably evenly distributed between lagging and leading strands (Figure 5c). Relative to the sizes of the replicons, megaplasmid A, suspected to have been acquired more recently in the genome, contains twice as many TA loci as the other replicons (Figure 5b). Interestingly, the genetic organizations are diverse, although pairs remain the most frequent (71.5 %): 12 genes in 4 triplets, 68 genes in 34 pairs and 15 solitary genes (12 encode antitoxins and 3 encode toxins, one of them being the chromosomal relE; Figure 4d).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fgb-2007-8-8-r155/MediaObjects/13059_2007_Article_1636_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

TA loci features in individual replicons of S. meliloti strain 1021. (a) Repartition of TA loci in the chromosome (new and confirming Pandey et al.'s [39] findings) and in the two megaplasmids. (b) Percentage of TA loci as a function of replicon size. (c) Repartition with respect to leading and lagging strands of replication. (d) Frequency of the three genomic organizations found for TA genes in the three replicons.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fgb-2007-8-8-r155/MediaObjects/13059_2007_Article_1636_Fig6_HTML.jpg
Figure 6

Maps of TA loci in individual replicons of S. meliloti strain 1021. The maps were created using CGView [53,54]. Green labels represent newly annotated TA genes, and orange labels represent RASTA-Bacteria predicted TA genes previously reported by Pandey et al. [39] On the chromosome, the grey SmeXXX regions correspond to genomic islands as described in the Islander database [55,56].

The classification of candidates into families according to sequence homology alone is a tedious task. Nevertheless, it seems the two major families are vapBC, consistent with the findings of Pandey et al. [39], and parDE. No ccdAB locus was found, but the results indicate there may be parDE and phd/doc members (distributed on all three replicons) among the candidates, as well as one mazEF pair, situated on plasmid B.

RASTA-bacteria results compared to those from previous studies

Our tool proved to be efficient and fast for the bacterium S. meliloti, which was used for its design. The effectiveness of RASTA-Bacteria for other sequences was first assessed using 14 prokaryotes previously studied by Pandey et al. [39] (Table 2): three gamma-proteobacteria (E. coli as an AT-rich generic model, Coxiella burnetii as an obligate host-associated organism and Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a free living, GC-rich bacterium); two alpha-proteobacteria (Bradyrhizobium japonicum, which has a large chromosome with significant horizontal rearrangements, and Agrobacterium tumefaciens, which has both circular and linear chromosomes); the genome with the largest predicted set of TA loci (Nitrosomonas europeae [39]); free-living firmicutes (Lactococcus lactis, Bacillus); one epsilon-proteobacteria (Campylobacter jejuni); three obligate host-associated organisms (Rickettsia prowazekii, Buchnera aphidicola, and Mycobacterium leprae for which Pandey et al. did not find any TA loci); and members of the Aquificae and Thermatogae extreme-life phylum (Thermotoga maritima, Aquifex aeolicus). Also, to assess the range of applicability of our tool, we tested the archaeum Sulfolobus tokodaii. The result files for all these species as well as for S. meliloti are available in the 'Pre-computed Data' section of our website [41].
Table 2

Results for 14 previously studied organisms

Organism

ccdAB

higBA

mazEF

parDE

phd/doc

relBE

vapBC

hipBA

Unclass.

Total

Aquifex aeolicus VF5*

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

1 (0)

6 (2)

2 (0)

0

9 (2)

A. tumefaciens str. C58*

0 (0)

0 (0)

1 (1)

3 (3)

1 (0)

7 (7)

5 (3)

6 (0)

1

24 (14)

Bacillus anthracis Ames

0 (0)

0 (0)

1 (1)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0

1 (1)

Bacillus subtilis

0 (0)

0 (0)

1 (1)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0

1 (1)

Bradyrhizobium japonicum

0 (0)

4 (4)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

1 (1)

6 (0)

0

12 (5)

Borrelia afzelii Pko

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0

0 (0)

Buchnera aphidicola str.

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0

0 (0)

Campylobacter jejuni

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

1 (0)

1 (0)

0 (0)

0

2 (0)

C. pneumoniae CWL029

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0

0 (0)

Coxiella burnetii RSA 493*

0 (0)

3 (3)

0 (0)

1 (1)

0 (0)

1 (1)

2 (2)

0 (0)

3

10 (7)

Escherichia coli K12

0 (0)

1 (1)

2 (2)

0 (0)

0 (0)

4 (3)

2 (0)

0 (0)

0

10 (6)

Haemophilus ducreyi

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0

0 (0)

Lactococcus lactis

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

1 (0)

6

7 (0)

Mycobacterium leprae TN

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0

0 (0)

Mycoplasma genitalium

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0

0 (0)

Nitrosomonas europaea

1 (1)

8 (7)

5 (5)

6 (6)

2 (2)

10 (10)

20 (14)

1 (0)

4

57 (45)

Prochlorococcus marinus

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0

0 (0)

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

0 (0)

5 (1)

0 (0)

1 (1)

1 (0)

1 (1)

0 (0)

2 (0)

3

13 (3)

Rickettsia prowazekii

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0

0 (0)

Sinorhizobium meliloti*

0 (0)

6 (3)

1 (0)

8 (0)

3 (0)

2 (2)

27 (7)

1 (0)

5

53 (12)

Sulfolobus tokodaii

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

3 (3)

4 (4)

29 (25)

1 (0)

0

37 (32)

Thermotoga maritima

0 (0)

0 (1)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

1 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0

2 (1)

Numbers stand for TA systems (singleton or doublet) as predicted by: RASTA-Bacteria (numbers in parentheses are as predicted by Pandey et al. [39]). *Plasmids were not included in the analysis by Pandey et al. [39]. Unclass., unclassified.

RASTA-bacteria identified all TA loci previously predicted by Pandey et al. except for one locus in S. meliloti (see above) and one higBA system in B. japonicum, which was not retained because the confidence score was too low (although there are conserved domains, they are ambiguous and were not included in TAcddb). The absence of detectable TA genes from the three obligate host-associated organisms tested (R. prowazekii, B. aphidicola, M. leprae) was confirmed, as was the presence of a single TA locus in Bacillus sp. Our tool was more sensitive than the previously used method: in all other tested genomes, RASTA-Bacteria identified a large number of new candidate loci. This was largely due to detection of potential members of the higBA, relBE, hipBA families and especially the vapBC family. For example, even in the case of the well-documented model E. coli, RASTA-Bacteria predicts at least four new TA pairs with high confidence (yfeD/yfeC, yafN/yafO, ygjN/ygjM and sohA/yahV). In addition, the ygiT/b3022, ydcQ/yncN and ydaS/ydaT loci have at least one member with a conserved domain commonly found in antitoxins, and ranked higher than published TA genes. Finally, YbaQ demonstrates near perfect identity with the profile corresponding to VapB antitoxins, but has no physically close partner, so it most likely is a solitary antitoxin, the first such to be reported in E. coli.

Ten previously undescribed TA systems were identified in the four replicons of A. tumefaciens (Table 2), although only the two chromosomes were previously studied. RASTA-Bacteria confirmed the 14 systems previously reported and identified 5 additional (orphan) loci on the circular chromosome, 1 full pair and 1 orphan gene on the linear chromosome, and 2 TA systems on plasmid AT. It revealed plasmid Ti carries no plasmid addiction systems, although it does have a gene resembling hipA (Atu6158, GI|17939291). However, this candidate is substantially shorter than its reference, such that it is unlikely to be functional, and it is almost 60 kb away from any possible hipB candidate.

We also assessed the sensitivity of our tool by examining genomes containing many TA loci, including that of N. europaea, reported to have no less than 45 TA loci, representing 88 genes. The RASTA-Bacteria scan of the genome of N. europaea yielded high confidence scores for 76 of these previously identified genes (86%), a confidence score between 50% and 70% for 11 (12.5%) and an unranked score for 1. It identified 11 additional TA loci on the N. europaea chromosome, if the hipBA locus is taken into account. Three are clearly vapBC pairs, although one is made of two relatively short and possibly disrupted genes, raising doubt about whether this pair is functional. The NE2103/NE2104 pair gave an intermediate confidence score, but has characteristics consistent with it being a TA system. NE1375/NE1376 may well define a new MazEF-like system. Finally, three orphan vapB and two orphan higA genes were found: it would be interesting to determine whether they are silent relics of ancient systems or are still active and responsible for a function. Remarkably, all these newly identified loci map in the same regions as the previously discovered systems, reinforcing the observation that TA loci in N. europaea cluster in particular regions of the genome.

We also applied our tool to organisms where no TA loci had been found previously, including L. lactis, in which we predict ten possible TA loci, eight of which consist of an orphan gene containing a region encoding the same HTH_DNA-binding (for helix-turn-helix) profile.

Finally, the archaeum with the most TA loci was S. tokodaii, with 32 TA loci [39]. RASTA-Bacteria confirmed 52 of the 61 genes at these 32 TA loci (3 singletons): the STS188/ST1628 and ST2136/37 pairs gave low scores because of an extreme overlap or because of an alternative start codon causing a bias in the size scoring process. The results for five other genes cannot be interpreted with certainty, but observations in other organisms where orphan TA genes do not seem uncommon suggests that some loci predicted to be pairs might in fact belong to the single-gene loci category. Nevertheless, four additional TA loci were identified, two of them being standard pairs of the VapBC family. The TA loci are unevenly distributed through the chromosome: two regions of approximately 240 and 440 kb seem to be devoid of TA loci, and the loci appear to be clustered in particular regions (data not shown).

Application to newly selected genomes

We performed a second round of analyses of newly selected, mostly recently published genomes (Table 3). At least three genomes from each phylogenetic branch and lifestyle were examined, except where only less complete genome sequences were available.
Table 3

RASTA-Bacteria predictions for newly sequenced genomes

Organism

ccdAB

higBA

mazEF

parDE

phd/doc

relBE

vapBC

hipBA

UnClass.

Total

A. phagocytophilum

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Arthrobacter aurescens

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Azoarcus sp. BH720

0

0

0

0

0

1

2

0

1

4

Bartonella bacilliformis

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

2

Burkholderia xenovorans

0

2

1

0

0

2

8

5

15

33

C. P. amoebophila

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Dehalococcoides sp.

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

3

2

7

Deinococcus geothermalis

0

0

1

0

0

0

2

0

3

6

Ehrlichia chaffeensis

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Frankia alni ACN14a

0

1

4

0

0

3

3

1

0

12

Gramella forsetii KT0803

1

3

1

5

0

1

1

0

0

12

Granulibacter bethesdensis

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

4

Lawsonia intracellularis

0

0

0

2

0

1

1

0

0

4

Magnetococcus sp.

1

6

0

4

1

1

4

0

0

17

Methanococcoides burtonii

0

2

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

5

Methanospirillum hungatei

0

2

3

0

0

7

15

0

2

30

Mycobacterium bovis

2

1

9

2

0

3

48

0

0

65

Mycobacterium sp. KMS

0

1

2

0

2

1

5

0

3

14

Myxococcus xanthus

0

4

0

0

0

0

0

1

3

10

Nanoarchaeaum equitans

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

O. yellows phytoplasma

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

P. naphthalenivorans

0

2

2

1

1

4

10

4

1

25

Pyrobaculum islandicum

0

1

0

0

0

0

2

0

2

5

Shewanella sp.

0

1

0

2

0

0

0

1

3

8

Thermofilum pendens

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Trichodesmium erythraeum

0

0

2

2

0

0

0

1

1

6

Wigglesworthia

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Wolbachia

0

0

0

0

0

7

0

0

0

7

Unclass., unclassified.

The analysis of both first and second rounds combined allowed us to confirm that there is no correlation between number of TA loci and total genome size, although the size of 1 Mb seems to represent some sort of threshold (Additional data file 1): in genomes below this size, no canonical TA systems were detected. We found no relationship between TA loci content and bacterial shape (for example rod, coccus, filament), respiratory system (aerobic or anaerobic), G+C content, presence of one or several replicons, or generation time (data not shown).

No evident association can be established between the number of TA loci and membership of a phylum (Additional data file 2) or lifestyle (Additional data file 3). The only 'free-living' organisms that do not have TA loci are Thermofilum pendens and Prochlorococcus marinus, although a possible 'pseudogenic' locus was detected in P. marinus strain MIT9303. The 13 other TA-free genomes are small (<1 Mb) and all correspond to obligate host-associated bacteria. In this study, the genomes of four obligate intracellular bacteria were newly discovered to carry TA systems (Wolbachia, Bartonella, Lawsonia and Azoarcus), in apparent contradiction of the hypothesis according to which endosymbiotic organisms tend to be free from TA systems. However, this hypothesis is consistent with the genome reduction theory, and quite a few studies show that chromosomal TA genes, at least, can be deleted (knockout mutants in E. coli) without any detectable impairment of the bacteria [15, 16, 52]. This assumption that TA systems have been lost during the process of genome reduction is also supported by the failure of RASTA-Bacteria to find any TA systems in the genomes of organelles, including the mitochondria (Homo sapiens, Mus musculus, Ostreococcus tauri) and chloroplast (Ostreococcus tauri, Lotus japonicum, Medicago truncatula) (data not shown).

An attempt to classify TA loci into families led to the observation that the largest family is vapBC (37% percent of the 532 loci found in this study), despite members of this family being absent from firmicutes and cyanobacteria. The other families each have similar numbers of representatives (higBA, 10% of the TA systems identified; mazEF, 12%; relBE, 12%; hipBA, 7%; parDE, 7%; and unclassified, 11%) except phd/doc and ccdAB, which are rarer (3% and 0.009%, respectively). Only the parDE family was confirmed to be confined to the bacterial domain: it was not found in archaea. Some organisms are 'monofamily', for example Wolbachia sp., which has seven relBE systems, whereas Polaromonas naphthalenivorans or N. europeae, two betaproteobacteria, contain members of all nine families (Tables 2 and 3).

The raw result tables along with selected candidates corresponding to the pre-computed genomes described in the article can be accessed from the designated section of the website [41].

Discussion

Exhaustive high-quality annotation is an essential part of exploiting the increasing number of genome sequences available, particularly of prokaryotes. One common problem of bacterial genome annotation is the frequent omission of sORFs, especially when they present limited or no sequence homology. The more problematic consequences of this omission include the underestimation of the number of ORFs and the loss of information concerning the presence of essential functions. This is particularly the case for TA genes, which encode small proteins involved in a large variety of essential bacterial functions, especially stress physiology and programmed cell death. Indeed, these systems open new horizons for antibiotic treatments, as they constitute promising targets.

Therefore, we have developed RASTA-Bacteria, a new and unique web-based annotation tool that searches, evaluates and stores TA modules in any prokaryotic sequenced genome. The simple interface allows biologists to identify TA genes quickly and reliably, whether they be organized in pairs or isolated. Although TA classification is still problematic, functional assignment is suggested through domain identification. The power of RASTA-Bacteria in annotating putative TA modules stems from it combining detection of function, using a new knowledge-based database (TAcddb), and genomic context of the genes (small and paired).

No absolute rule can be inferred for exact prediction of the number and nature of TA loci in the genome of a bacterium based only on its characteristics, such as its phylum or ecosystem. The search for TA genes must thus be carried out de novo for each genome (or even each strain and each replicon), making RASTA-Bacteria a potentially valuable tool. The results described in the present study illustrate how satisfactorily the tool performs in terms of TA gene-finding accuracy (compared to earlier annotations by Pandey et al. [39]). In addition, the efficiency of RASTA-Bacteria is independent of genome architecture (it works with linear and circular chromosomes from 9 to less than 1 Mb, megaplasmids, plasmids), G+C content, bacterial classification (Gram+ and Gram- Eubacteria, Archaea), and lifestyle (free living, symbiont, endosymbiont). Furthermore, RASTA-Bacteria proved to be functional for eukaryotic sequences. It is thus conceivable that our tool will bring new insight to the TA world.

Our study also shows that TA systems are more various and numerous than initially reported by Pandey et al. [39], with a maximum of 65 loci in Mycobacterium bovis (Table 3). We also found a significant number of genes, encoding potential toxins or antitoxins, with no partner mapping in their vicinity. It is difficult to evaluate whether or not this phenomenon is the result of classical TA system breakage with loss of functionality of the subsequent orphan genes, or if these independent elements have evolved towards new functionalities, or even if distant interconnection is possible in the TA world. These solitary genes are not eliminated from the screening process and will be, like genes in pairs, subject to biological validations, as some ORFs that have been scored may in fact well be pseudogenes. An interesting future development of RASTA-Bacteria would be to add a 'pseudogene' field to the table.

Although the design of the RASTA-bacteria tool can sometimes lead to bias when assessing the pairing and/or length properties, it is also interesting that we found many longer proteins (between 350 and 500 amino acids) displaying similarity with TA domains throughout our study (data not shown). These findings are confusing, as they could either be the consequence of the ability of TA genes to invade other genes, and thus another argument in favor of their genetic mobility, or of a possible fusion process among toxin and antitoxin genes.

One of the most important improvements of RASTA-bacteria would be the refinement of the automatic functional classification of TA systems. Indeed, TA proteins are currently classified into rather vague classes or subclasses in the result tables, with generic domains such as the PIN domain: more precise classification of the candidates presently requires manual analysis. RASTA-Bacteria also identified numerous candidates displaying the HTH-DNA binding domains. When adjacent to an unambiguous toxin domain, these signatures could be clearly interpreted, but in some cases the identified candidates seem to constitute an orphan gene. It will thus be interesting to determine whether these loci are indeed true TA loci, or whether they constitute a new uncharacterized family of 'classical' regulators. In any case we hope that RASTA-bacteria will help biologists with bacterial TA functional characterization, which will in turn allow us to improve our algorithm by expanding our knowledge and database.

Additional data files

The following additional data are available with the online version of this paper. Additional data file 1 is a figure showing the number of TAs in genomes as a function of size. Additional data file 2 is a figure showing the number of TAs in genomes with respect to phylogeny classification. Additional data file 3 is a figure showing the number of TAs in genomes with respect to life style.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Philippe Veber for mathematical advice, Thomas Derrien for useful suggestions concerning the web tool, and more generally the Genouest Bioinformatics Platform for web hosting. EWS is supported by the Conseil Régional de Bretagne.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
CNRS UMR6061 Génétique et Développement, Université de Rennes 1, IFR 140
(2)
CNRS UMR6026 Interactions Cellulaires et Moléculaires, Groupe DUALS, Université de Rennes 1, IFR140

References

  1. GOLD. [http://www.genomesonline.org/gold.cgi]
  2. Liolios K, Tavernarakis N, Hugenholtz P, Kyrpides NC: The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) v.2: a monitor of genome projects worldwide. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34: D332-334. 10.1093/nar/gkj145.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Skovgaard M, Jensen LJ, Brunak S, Ussery D, Krogh A: On the total number of genes and their length distribution in complete microbial genomes. Trends Genet. 2001, 17: 425-428. 10.1016/S0168-9525(01)02372-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Sopko R, Andrews B: Small open reading frames: Not so small anymore. Genome Res. 2006, 16: 314-315. 10.1101/gr.4976706.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Kastenmayer JP, Ni L, Chu A, Kitchen LE, Au WC, Yang H, Carter CD, Wheeler D, Davis RW, Boeke JD, et al: Functional genomics of genes with small open reading frames (sORFs) in S. cerevisiae. Genome Res. 2006, 16: 365-373. 10.1101/gr.4355406.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Engelberg-Kulka H, Glaser G: Addiction modules and programmed cell death and antideath in bacterial cultures. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1999, 53: 43-70. 10.1146/annurev.micro.53.1.43.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Gerdes K, Rasmussen PB, Molin S: Unique type of plasmid maintenance function: postsegregational killing of plasmid-free cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1986, 83: 3116-3120. 10.1073/pnas.83.10.3116.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Gerdes K, Gultyaev AP, Franch T, Pedersen K, Mikkelsen ND: Antisense RNA-regulated programmed cell death. Annu Rev Genet. 1997, 31: 1-31. 10.1146/annurev.genet.31.1.1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Ogura T, Hiraga S: Mini-F plasmid genes that couple host cell division to plasmid proliferation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1983, 80: 4784-4788. 10.1073/pnas.80.15.4784.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Metzger S, Dror IB, Aizenman E, Schreiber G, Toone M, Friesen JD, Cashel M, Glaser G: The nucleotide sequence and characterization of the relA gene of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1988, 263: 15699-15704.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Masuda Y, Miyakawa K, Nishimura Y, Ohtsubo E: chpA and chpB, Escherichia coli chromosomal homologs of the pem locus responsible for stable maintenance of plasmid R100. J Bacteriol. 1993, 175: 6850-6856.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Black DS, Irwin B, Moyed HS: Autoregulation of hip, an operon that affects lethality due to inhibition of peptidoglycan or DNA synthesis. J Bacteriol. 1994, 176: 4081-4091.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Bloomfield GA, Whittle G, McDonagh MB, Katz ME, Cheetham BF: Analysis of sequences flanking the vap regions of Dichelobacter nodosus: evidence for multiple integration events, a killer system, and a new genetic element. Microbiology. 1997, 143: 553-562.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Gotfredsen M, Gerdes K: The Escherichia coli relBE genes belong to a new toxin-antitoxin gene family. Mol Microbiol. 1998, 29: 1065-1076. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00993.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Aizenman E, Engelberg-Kulka H, Glaser G: An Escherichia coli chromosomal "addiction module" regulated by 3',5'-bispyrophosphate: a model for programmed bacterial cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996, 93: 6059-6063. 10.1073/pnas.93.12.6059.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Pedersen K, Christensen SK, Gerdes K: Rapid induction and reversal of a bacteriostatic condition by controlled expression of toxins and antitoxins. Mol Microbiol. 2002, 45: 501-510. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03027.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Amitai S, Yassin Y, Engelberg-Kulka H: MazF-mediated cell death in Escherichia coli: a point of no return. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186: 8295-8300. 10.1128/JB.186.24.8295-8300.2004.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Kolodkin-Gal I, Engelberg-Kulka H: Induction of Escherichia coli chromosomal mazEF by stressful conditions causes an irreversible loss of viability. J Bacteriol. 2006, 188: 3420-3423. 10.1128/JB.188.9.3420-3423.2006.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Grønlund H, Gerdes K: Toxin-antitoxin systems homologous with relBE of Escherichia coli plasmid P307 are ubiquitous in prokaryotes. J Mol Biol. 1999, 285: 1401-1415. 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2416.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Gerdes K, Christensen SK, Løbner-Olesen A: Prokaryotic toxin-antitoxin stress response loci. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005, 3: 371-382. 10.1038/nrmicro1147.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. De la Hoz AB, Ayora S, Sitkiewicz I, Fernández S, Pankiewicz R, Alonso JC, Ceglowski P: Plasmid copy-number control and better-than-random segregation genes of pSM19035 share a common regulator. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 728-733. 10.1073/pnas.97.2.728.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Sobecky PA, Easter CL, Bear PD, Helinski DR: Characterization of the stable maintenance properties of the par region of broad-host-range plasmid RK2. J Bacteriol. 1996, 178: 2086-2093.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Tian QB, Hayashi T, Murata T, Terawaki Y: Gene product identification and promoter analysis of hig locus of plasmid Rts1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996, 225: 679-684. 10.1006/bbrc.1996.1229.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Christensen-Dalsgaard M, Gerdes K: Two higBA loci in the Vibrio cholerae superintegron encode mRNA cleaving enzymes and can stabilize plasmids. Mol Microbiol. 2006, 62: 397-411. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05385.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Hazan R, Sat B, Reches M, Engelberg-Kulka H: Postsegregational killing mediated by the P1 phage 'addiction module' phd-doc requires the Escherichia coli programmed cell death system mazEF. J Bacteriol. 2001, 183: 2046-2050. 10.1128/JB.183.6.2046-2050.2001.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Anantharaman V, Aravind L: New connections in the prokaryotic toxin-antitoxin network: relationship with the eukaryotic nonsense-mediated RNA decay system. Genome Biol. 2003, 4: R81-10.1186/gb-2003-4-12-r81.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Bernard P, Kézdy KE, Van Melderen L, Steyaert J, Wyns L, Pato ML, Higgins PN, Couturier M: The F plasmid CcdB protein induces efficient ATP-dependent DNA cleavage by gyrase. J Mol Biol. 1993, 234: 534-541. 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1609.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Christensen SK, Gerdes K: RelE toxins from bacteria and Archaea cleave mRNAs on translating ribosomes, which are rescued by tmRNA. Mol Microbiol. 2003, 48: 1389-1400. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03512.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Pedersen K, Zavialov AV, Pavlov MY, Elf J, Gerdes K, Ehrenberg M: The bacterial toxin RelE displays codon-specific cleavage of mRNAs in the ribosomal A site. Cell. 2003, 112: 131-140. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01248-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang Y, Zhu L, Zhang J, Inouye M: Characterization of ChpBK, an mRNA interferase from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280: 26080-26088. 10.1074/jbc.M502050200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang J, Zhang Y, Inouye M: Characterization of the interactions within the mazEF addiction module of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 32300-32306. 10.1074/jbc.M304767200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Engelberg-Kulka H, Sat B, Reches M, Amitai S, Hazan R: Bacterial programmed cell death systems as targets for antibiotics. Trends Microbiol. 2004, 12: 66-71. 10.1016/j.tim.2003.12.008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Sat B, Hazan R, Fisher T, Khaner H, Glaser G, Engelberg-Kulka H: Programmed cell death in Escherichia coli: some antibiotics can trigger mazEF lethality. J Bacteriol. 2001, 183: 2041-2045. 10.1128/JB.183.6.2041-2045.2001.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Hazan R, Engelberg-Kulka H: Escherichia coli mazEF-mediated cell death as a defense mechanism that inhibits the spread of phage P1. Mol Genet Genomics. 2004, 272: 227-234. 10.1007/s00438-004-1048-y.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Sat B, Reches M, Engelberg-Kulka H: The Escherichia coli mazEF suicide module mediates thymineless death. J Bacteriol. 2003, 185: 1803-1807. 10.1128/JB.185.6.1803-1807.2003.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Hazan R, Sat B, Engelberg-Kulka H: Escherichia coli mazEF-mediated cell death is triggered by various stressful conditions. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186: 3663-3669. 10.1128/JB.186.11.3663-3669.2004.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Hayes F: Toxins-antitoxins: plasmid maintenance, programmed cell death, and cell cycle arrest. Science. 2003, 301: 1496-1499. 10.1126/science.1088157.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Nyström T: Stationary-phase physiology. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2004, 58: 161-181. 10.1146/annurev.micro.58.030603.123818.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Pandey DP, Gerdes K: Toxin-antitoxin loci are highly abundant in free-living but lost from host-associated prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33: 966-976. 10.1093/nar/gki201.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Stajich JE, Block D, Boulez K, Brenner SE, Chervitz SA, Dagdigian C, Fuellen G, Gilbert JG, Korf I, Lapp H, et al: The Bioperl toolkit: Perl modules for the life sciences. Genome Res. 2002, 12: 1611-1618. 10.1101/gr.361602.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. RASTA-Bacteria. [http://genoweb.univ-rennes1.fr/duals/RASTA-Bacteria]
  42. Korch SB, Hill TM: Ectopic overexpression of wild-type and mutant hipA genes in Escherichia coli: effects on macromolecular synthesis and persister formation. J Bacteriol. 2006, 188: 3826-3836. 10.1128/JB.01740-05.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Bickle TA, Krüger DH: Biology of DNA restriction. Microbiol Rev. 1993, 57: 434-450.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Tock MR, Dryden DT: The biology of restriction and anti-restriction. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2005, 8: 466-472. 10.1016/j.mib.2005.06.003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Mittenhuber G: Occurrence of mazEF-like antitoxin/toxin systems in bacteria. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 1999, 1: 295-302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Brown JM, Shaw KJ: A novel family of Escherichia coli toxin-antitoxin gene pairs. J Bacteriol. 2003, 185: 6600-6608. 10.1128/JB.185.22.6600-6608.2003.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. BLAST Downloads. [ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/executables/]
  48. CDD Downloads. [ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/pub/mmdb/cdd/]
  49. REFSEQ Database. [ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/genomes/Bacteria]
  50. Galibert F, Finan TM, Long SR, Puhler A, Abola P, Ampe F, Barloy-Hubler F, Barnett MJ, Becker A, Boistard P, et al: The composite genome of the legume symbiont Sinorhizobium meliloti. Science. 2001, 293: 668-672. 10.1126/science.1060966.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Bodogai M, Ferenczi S, Bashtovyy D, Miclea P, Papp P, Dusha I: The ntrPR operon of Sinorhizobium meliloti is organized and functions as a toxin-antitoxin module. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2006, 19: 811-822. 10.1094/MPMI-19-0811.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Christensen SK, Mikkelsen M, Pedersen K, Gerdes K: RelE, a global inhibitor of translation, is activated during nutritional stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 14328-14333. 10.1073/pnas.251327898.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. CGView. [http://wishart.biology.ualberta.ca/cgview/index.html]
  54. Stothard P, Wishart DS: Circular genome visualization and exploration using CGView. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21: 537-539. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti054.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. ISLANDER. [http://kementari.bioinformatics.vt.edu/cgi-bin/islander.cgi]
  56. Mantri Y, Williams KP: Islander: a database of integrative islands in prokaryotic genomes, the associated integrases and their DNA site specificities. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32: D55-58. 10.1093/nar/gkh059.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhang YX, Li J, Guo XK, Wu C, Bi B, Ren SX, Wu CF, Zhao GP: Characterization of a novel toxin-antitoxin module, VapBC, encoded by Leptospira interrogans chromosome. Cell Res. 2004, 14: 208-216. 10.1038/sj.cr.7290221.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Makarova KS, Grishin NV, Koonin EV: The HicAB cassette, a putative novel, RNA-targeting toxin-antitoxin system in archaea and bacteria. Bioinformatics. 2006, 22: 2581-2584. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl418.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Clissold PM, Ponting CP: PIN domains in nonsense-mediated mRNA decay and RNAi. Curr Biol. 2000, 10: R888-890. 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00858-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Arcus VL, Rainey PB, Turner SJ: The PIN-domain toxin-antitoxin array in mycobacteria. Trends Microbiol. 2005, 13: 360-365. 10.1016/j.tim.2005.06.008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Hayes F: A family of stability determinants in pathogenic bacteria. J Bacteriol. 1998, 180: 6415-6418.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Polidori M, Haas A: VapI, a new member of the Rhodococcus equi Vap family. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2006, 90: 299-304. 10.1007/s10482-006-9073-y.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Gazit E, Sauer RT: The Doc toxin and Phd antidote proteins of the bacteriophage P1 plasmid addiction system form a heterotrimeric complex. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 16813-16818. 10.1074/jbc.274.24.16813.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Johnson EP, Strom AR, Helinski DR: Plasmid RK2 toxin protein ParE: purification and interaction with the ParD antitoxin protein. J Bacteriol. 1996, 178: 1420-1429.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Smith JA, Magnuson RD: Modular organization of the Phd repressor/antitoxin protein. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186: 2692-2698. 10.1128/JB.186.9.2692-2698.2004.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Pullinger GD, Lax AJ: A Salmonella dublin virulence plasmid locus that affects bacterial growth under nutrient-limited conditions. Mol Microbiol. 1992, 6: 1631-1643. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb00888.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Min YN, Tabuchi A, Womble DD, Rownd RH: Transcription of the stability operon of IncFII plasmid NR1. J Bacteriol. 1991, 173: 2378-2384.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Tian QB, Ohnishi M, Tabuchi A, Terawaki Y: A new plasmid-encoded proteic killer gene system: cloning, sequencing, and analyzing hig locus of plasmid Rts1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996, 220: 280-284. 10.1006/bbrc.1996.0396.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Tam JE, Kline BC: The F plasmid ccd autorepressor is a complex of CcdA and CcdB proteins. Mol Gen Genet. 1989, 219: 26-32. 10.1007/BF00261153.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Tsuchimoto S, Ohtsubo H, Ohtsubo E: Two genes, pemK and pemI, responsible for stable maintenance of resistance plasmid R100. J Bacteriol. 1988, 170: 1461-1466.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Sevin and Barloy-Hubler; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.